2010
DOI: 10.1890/09-0262.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Habitat isolation moderates the strength of top‐down control in experimental pond food webs

Abstract: Abstract. Habitat isolation is well known to alter patterns of species' abundance, richness, and the ratios of predators : prey. Less clear, however, is how isolation alters interactions within food webs. Here, we present the results from an experiment performed in artificial ponds (mesocosms) manipulating habitat isolation crossed with a predator reduction treatment to disentangle how isolation mediates the top-down effect of predators. The strength of the trophic cascade, from predators, through herbivores, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
38
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1, inset) instead of being positively correlated with, or invariant of total richness as in many terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems 20 . These findings contradict theoretical predictions 13,21 and empirical studies of other ecosystems, which suggest that species highest in the food web should be most sensitive to habitat isolation 4,10,12,22 . Here we develop a mathematical dispersal-colonization-extinction framework that resolves both of these discrepancies.…”
contrasting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1, inset) instead of being positively correlated with, or invariant of total richness as in many terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems 20 . These findings contradict theoretical predictions 13,21 and empirical studies of other ecosystems, which suggest that species highest in the food web should be most sensitive to habitat isolation 4,10,12,22 . Here we develop a mathematical dispersal-colonization-extinction framework that resolves both of these discrepancies.…”
contrasting
confidence: 67%
“…2b). The linearized model had the form ln(S) ¼ a 1 þ a 2 d 2 þ a 3 ln(coastal length) þ a 4 6 [i  ln(coastal length)] þ O, where a j are regression coefficients and i is an indicator variable denoting whether each datum was a predator or prey. The statistical fit with Gaussian spatial autocorrelation had the lowest AIC (AIC ¼ 5.2, r 2 ¼ 0.78).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In aquatic predator-prey metacommunities, the mean density of the predator 22 (Didinium nasutum) was highest at intermediate dispersal rates whereas the mean density of 23 the prey (Colpidium striatum) was decreased by dispersal (Holyoak and Lawler 1996b). In 24 trophically more complex metacommunities, dispersal between mesocosms increased 25 predator biomass, decreased herbivore biomass and increased primary producer biomass 26 (Chase et al 2010). This suggests that the trophic cascade was stronger in mesocosms 1 connected by dispersal than in isolated mesocosms.…”
Section: Dispersal Behaviours and Top-down Control 21 22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there has been work in larger man-made water bodies (farm ponds (Céréghino et al 2008;Brainwood and Burgin 2009;Gioria et al 2010), irrigation pools (Abellan et al 2006) experimental ponds used to examine ecological processes and conservation issues (Fairchild et al 1999;Sunahara et al 2002;Blaustein et al 2005;Frisch and Green 2007;Mokany et al 2008;Chase et al 2010;Schröder et al 2012)), studies of small 'accidentally' formed habitats are few. An exception is the work of Bilton et al (2008) who examined the ecology and conservation status of a set of fluctuating and temporary ponds which included some formed on ancient cart tracks, in gateways and along hedgerows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%