2000
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Habitat loss and raptor predation: disentangling long– and short–term causes of red grouse declines

Abstract: The number of red grouse (Lagopus lagopus scoticus) shot in the UK has declined by 50% during the 20th century This decline has coincided with reductions in the area of suitable habitat and recoveries in the populations of some avian predators. Here we use long-term records of shooting bags and a large-scale manipulation of raptor density to disentangle the effects of habitat loss and raptor predation on grouse populations. The numbers of grouse harvested on the Eskdale half of Langholm Moor in southern Scotla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
107
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absence of strong relationships between the abundance of red grouse and habitat characteristics either within‐estate or among‐moor may be because only a small proportion of available heather biomass is consumed by the birds (Jenkins, Watson & Miller 1963; Savory 1978). In addition, red grouse abundance is known to be affected by a variety of other factors, including heather nutrient status, intensity of parasite infection and abundance of predators, which were not taken into account in the current study (Moss 1969; Miller & Watson 1978; Hudson, Dobson & Newborn 1992; Thirgood et al . 2000b, 2000c).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The absence of strong relationships between the abundance of red grouse and habitat characteristics either within‐estate or among‐moor may be because only a small proportion of available heather biomass is consumed by the birds (Jenkins, Watson & Miller 1963; Savory 1978). In addition, red grouse abundance is known to be affected by a variety of other factors, including heather nutrient status, intensity of parasite infection and abundance of predators, which were not taken into account in the current study (Moss 1969; Miller & Watson 1978; Hudson, Dobson & Newborn 1992; Thirgood et al . 2000b, 2000c).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1999). These typically long‐term changes in habitat coupled with locally high raptor predation have been shown to explain the decline and restriction of a red grouse population (Thirgood et al . 2000c).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Globally, the expansion of human activities, combined with the restoration and legal protection of wildlife populations has led to increasing contact between humans and wildlife [11]. In many instances this has led to increased conflict including livestock depredation by carnivores [12], predation of game birds by raptors [13], and threats to human life [14]. Conflicts can create considerable controversy when legal issues are concerned and livelihoods are at risk; in such instances mitigation can be politically sensitive and political pressures may override scientific evidence [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marked impacts by raptors have been recorded only on galliform birds, for example where goshawks Accipiter gentilis L. were estimated by radio‐tracking to kill 56% of wild hen pheasants Phasianus colchicus L. during one winter in a Swedish study area (Kenward, Marcström & Karlbom 1981). The best evidence to date of prolonged impact by avian predators on wild prey is the decline in red grouse Lagopus lagopus scotticus Latham density in an area where raptor density was allowed to increase strongly, compared with increasing numbers of grouse in nearby areas with few raptors (Redpath & Thirgood 1997, 1999; Thirgood & Redpath 1997; Thirgood et al . 2000a,b,c).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%