2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-011-9988-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Habitat loss of floodplain meadows in north Germany since the 1950s

Abstract: Floodplain meadows are severely threatened by land use change and intensification in Central Europe. This study investigates quantitative and qualitative changes in the vegetation of wet and species-rich mesic meadows in the floodplains of north Germany since the 1950s, considering their spatial extent, fragmentation, and replacement by other land use types. Historical high-resolution vegetation maps were compared with recent vegetation surveys in seven study regions (six unprotected areas, one protected refer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
46
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the non-invaded grasslands neither the plant species number nor the edge proximity affected the ant communities, indicating that plants are not a limiting factor and habitat suitability is probably equal across the entire area of the non-invaded grasslands. Plant species are numerous in the non-invaded grasslands which are known for their high level of biodiversity (Skórka et al 2007;Moroń et al 2008a, b;Krause et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the non-invaded grasslands neither the plant species number nor the edge proximity affected the ant communities, indicating that plants are not a limiting factor and habitat suitability is probably equal across the entire area of the non-invaded grasslands. Plant species are numerous in the non-invaded grasslands which are known for their high level of biodiversity (Skórka et al 2007;Moroń et al 2008a, b;Krause et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the report, it is clear that GI may influence the capacity of ecosystem to provide services across a range of landscape scales (Feld et al 2009). For example, GI can mitigate risks from climate change by protecting urban regions against floods and other negative effects of changing weather patterns (Keim et al 2006, Krause et al 2011.…”
Section: Green Infrastructure and Ecosystem Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conservation of landscape features that support species movement and dispersal is particularly important as a means of supporting the coherence of the Natura 2000 network (Kettunen et al 2007). However, many studies and reports argued that such network might not establish its coherence as much of Europe's landscape is highly fragmented and under intensive land use, transport routes and urban sprawl (EEA 2010, Krause et al 2011). The Natura 2000 network can be interpreted as GI cells that already provide ecosystem services, such as food, air quality, carbon sequestration, flood management, water treatment, local climate conditions, soil erosion prevention, etc.…”
Section: Review Of Examples Of Gi Approaches In Europementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, changes to the socioeconomic conditions may drive the transition of forest landscapes in terms of composition and configuration and this, in turn, could affect ecological processes that depend on management (Collingham & Huntley 2000). Clearly managing forest landscapes is a difficult task (Krause et al 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%