2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2007.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Habitat relationships between wild and domestic ungulates in Nepalese trans-Himalaya

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vegetation type and altitude were the most influential variables in explaining the distribution of ungulates in our study area (Shrestha & Wegge 2008). We therefore used data on use of vegetation types and altitude from our earlier habitat study (Shrestha & Wegge 2008), based on direct observation of 766 groups of naur, 392 groups of yak and 257 groups of smallstock throughout the course of a year. While doing so, we systematically searched the opposite slopes from fixed vantage points and mapped the distribution of animals on 1:10000 topographic maps.…”
Section: Habitat Usementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Vegetation type and altitude were the most influential variables in explaining the distribution of ungulates in our study area (Shrestha & Wegge 2008). We therefore used data on use of vegetation types and altitude from our earlier habitat study (Shrestha & Wegge 2008), based on direct observation of 766 groups of naur, 392 groups of yak and 257 groups of smallstock throughout the course of a year. While doing so, we systematically searched the opposite slopes from fixed vantage points and mapped the distribution of animals on 1:10000 topographic maps.…”
Section: Habitat Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between naur and yak, high resource-use overlaps occurred temporally in spring and cross-seasonally in autumn (Fig. 4a), at which times both preferentially used alpine Shrestha & Wegge 2008). * Availability was assumed to be constant for naur in all seasons, but was adjusted for domestic stock according to seasonal restrictions imposed on certain pastures by herders.…”
Section: Resource-use Overlapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kittur et al (2010) evaluated the livestock grazing impacts on the Himalayan tahr population in Kedarnath Wildlife Sanctuary, Uttarakhand, and reported that in addition to affecting the habitat adversely, heavy grazing may cause shortages of food for Himalayan tahr during the resource crunch period. Studies dealing with livestock and wild ungulate interactions in the Trans-Himalayas have been carried out by Mishra (2001), Raghavan (2003), Bagchi et al (2004), Mishra et al (2004), Namgail et al (2007), and Shrestha and Wegge (2008). These studies confirmed that livestock grazing and collateral human activities can interfere with resource acquisition by wild ungulates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Argali was reported to use habitat away from cliffs with moderate slopes and high vegetation cover in the absence of livestock, and shifted close to cliffs with steeper slopes and low vegetation cover in their presence (Namgail et al 2007). In addition, the intrusion of goat and sheep further up the hill during summer resulted in competition on elevations of Blue sheep Pseudois nayaur (Shrestha & Wegge 2008). In Nandadevi Biosphere Reserve 49% diet overlap was reported between livestock and wild ungulates (Bhattacharya et al 2012); 68% Himalayan Tahr (Hemitragus jemlahicus) and livestock in Tungnath (Bhattacharya et al 2012); 58% between kiang and sheep (Hussain et al 2010); 57% kiang and goats (Hussain et al 2010); 82% kiang and horses (Hussain et al 2010).…”
Section: R E S U L T S a N D D I S C U S S Iomentioning
confidence: 99%