2011
DOI: 10.1002/rra.1598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HABITAT SUITABILITY MODELLING AT MESOHABITAT SCALE AND EFFECTS OF DAM OPERATION ON THE ENDANGERED JúCAR NASE, PARACHONDROSTOMA ARRIGONIS (RIVER CABRIEL, SPAIN)

Abstract: Soares Costa, RM.; Martinez-Capel, F.; Muñoz Mas, R.; Alcaraz-Hernández, JD.; Garófano-Gómez, V. (2012). Habitat suitability modelling at mesohabitat scale and effects of dam operation on the endangered Júcar nase, Parachondrostoma arrigonis (River Cabriel, Spain). River Research and Applications. 28(6):740-752. doi:10.1002/rra.1598. 1 This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF version following peer review of this article, which has been 1 published in definitive publisher-authenticated form at: Habita… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the RF model built with 20 variables also shows a notable difference in training and validation performances. Also for the RF case, the most important predictors in this model have been identified by previous studies as relevant to freshwater fish species (Bernardo et al, 2003;Costa et al, 2012). The high differences between training and validation performances confirm the hypothesis that a very complex model with many degrees of freedom is not robust (Maier and Dandy, 2000) Looking at the models built after variable selection, ANN and RF showed no significant differences of performance in the cross-validation procedure (R 2 = 68% for RF and R 2 = 66% for ANN, Table IV).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, the RF model built with 20 variables also shows a notable difference in training and validation performances. Also for the RF case, the most important predictors in this model have been identified by previous studies as relevant to freshwater fish species (Bernardo et al, 2003;Costa et al, 2012). The high differences between training and validation performances confirm the hypothesis that a very complex model with many degrees of freedom is not robust (Maier and Dandy, 2000) Looking at the models built after variable selection, ANN and RF showed no significant differences of performance in the cross-validation procedure (R 2 = 68% for RF and R 2 = 66% for ANN, Table IV).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these species perform small-scale migrations for reproduction within the river system and the only one migrating at a large scale is Anguilla Anguilla, a catadromous fish species with a complex life-history that includes migrations across the Atlantic Ocean. The number of individuals of these native fish species have decreased consistently in the last decades as a consequence of habitat modifications (including barriers) and pollution in the lower river reaches (Doadrio, 2001;Costa et al, 2012). 24 environmental variables (Table II) were used to construct the ANN and RF models, which were selected considering their ecological importance for fish life cycle (Granado-Lorencio, 1996;Jackson et al, 2001;Bernardo et al, 2003;Costa et al, 2012).…”
Section: Table Imentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ecological models can support decision making in environmental and conservation management [16] and have already been applied to assess the impact of dams on fish [17][18][19][20][21][22], macroinvertebrates [23][24][25], amphibians [26] and vegetation [27][28][29]. Models are being increasingly used in environmental assessment, planning and management [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Wootton (1998) heterogeneous systems supply a large variety of microhabitats with sites where fish species can shelter against predators and find a wide variety of feeding resources and places for reproduction. Recently, some studies using habitat simulation models have reinforced that physical habitat variables and cover availability determine patterns of habitat use in rivers and streams (Lee & Suen, 2012;Costa et al, 2012;Teresa & Casatti, 2013;Costa et al, 2013). However, the capability of prediction of these models depends on the understanding of how the species respond to environmental gradient conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%