2024
DOI: 10.1111/ecog.07267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Habitat suitability models reveal the spatial signal of environmental DNA in riverine networks

Jeanine Brantschen,
Fabian Fopp,
Antoine Adde
et al.

Abstract: The rapid loss of biodiversity in freshwater systems asks for a robust and spatially explicit understanding of species' occurrences. As two complementing approaches, habitat suitability models provide information about species' potential occurrence, while environmental DNA (eDNA) based assessments provide indication of species' actual occurrence. Individually, both approaches are used in ecological studies to characterize biodiversity, yet they are rarely combined. Here, we integrated high‐resolution habitat s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 62 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, our data showed a large mismatch between expected and observed taxa, based on the habitat suitability. This problem was also identified previously in habitat suitability modelling (Brantschen et al, 2024). Presence/absence data might be less indicative for environmental filtering than abundance data because species may be found at less suitable habitats but in lower abundance (Johnson & Vaughn, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In general, our data showed a large mismatch between expected and observed taxa, based on the habitat suitability. This problem was also identified previously in habitat suitability modelling (Brantschen et al, 2024). Presence/absence data might be less indicative for environmental filtering than abundance data because species may be found at less suitable habitats but in lower abundance (Johnson & Vaughn, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%