2014
DOI: 10.1177/1474474014560682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Habits, style and how to wear them lightly

Abstract: Contributing to cultural geography's emerging interest in the work of Felix Ravaisson, this article explores the relationship between the impersonal force of habit and the personalised production of subjectivity. More precisely, our concern is with the relationship between habit and the stylisation of self that can be witnessed in the production of the intellectual subject. Paying particular attention to the relationship he traces between habit, consciousness and the effort that defines subjectivity, we explor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is part of Dewey's argument on habits in relation to social change and social division, giving his approach a greater radical edge, according to Schwanen et al (discussed later). They see the main distinction between Ravaisson and Dewey in Ravaisson's idea of habit as a way of understanding the unity and continuity of nature whereas Dewey is not prepared to "admit to the improvised spontaneity of all life" because this "would be to lose sight of the dialectical formation of the social that is so crucial to pragmatism" (Hynes andSharpe 2015, 69, referring to Schoenbach 2004). I will take up the question of these divisions between 'life' and mechanisms in the rest of the paper, suffice to say that, assuming the unity and continuity of nature and the autonomous force of life takes us into treatments of habit in geography that see it as a contraction of wider worldly, immanent forces, certain stabilisations of which, individuate or entrain subjectivities (Dewsbury 2015).…”
Section: Contemporary Discussion Of Habitmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is part of Dewey's argument on habits in relation to social change and social division, giving his approach a greater radical edge, according to Schwanen et al (discussed later). They see the main distinction between Ravaisson and Dewey in Ravaisson's idea of habit as a way of understanding the unity and continuity of nature whereas Dewey is not prepared to "admit to the improvised spontaneity of all life" because this "would be to lose sight of the dialectical formation of the social that is so crucial to pragmatism" (Hynes andSharpe 2015, 69, referring to Schoenbach 2004). I will take up the question of these divisions between 'life' and mechanisms in the rest of the paper, suffice to say that, assuming the unity and continuity of nature and the autonomous force of life takes us into treatments of habit in geography that see it as a contraction of wider worldly, immanent forces, certain stabilisations of which, individuate or entrain subjectivities (Dewsbury 2015).…”
Section: Contemporary Discussion Of Habitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus Bissell (2015) sees as habit as a ‘virtual infrastructure’ comprising propensities and dispositions (Bissell, 2015). The virtual infrastructure of habit can be realised in practical competences in coping with new milieu, but with changing intensities (tracked in the example of long-haul air travel) that in turn affects the capacities of bodies to act (see also Hynes and Sharpe, 2015).…”
Section: Contemporary Discussion Of Habitmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In doing so, I am exploiting the emerging interest in geography in the work of Felix Ravaisson (see Bissell, ; Dewsbury and Bissell, ; Hynes and Sharpe, ). As Bissell () argues, Ravaisson enables an appreciation of the vitality, but also the vulnerability, of the habit‐body.…”
Section: The Aesthetics Of the Production Of Gracementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This question grows out of broader attempts across human geography to account for processes of subjectivation by way of emergent and relational ontologies (Anderson and Harrison, 2010; Bissell, 2011; Dewsbury, 2012; Hynes and Sharpe, 2015; Lapworth, 2015; Roberts, 2012; Wylie, 2010). Human geographers have long been interested in rethinking subjectivity, sociality, structure and context by working with and developing nonrepresentational (Thrift, 2007), posthuman (Castree and Nash, 2006) and new materialist (Whatmore, 2006) approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%