1974
DOI: 10.1176/ajp.131.9.1015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Habitual Violence : A Profile of 62 Men

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But, despite the emphasis on social environment, Ross and Mackay also noted that their subjects had posed special problems in other institutions before being sent to this training school, and were considered the 'failures' of the juvenile justice system. Interestingly, similar findings of uncontrollable tension leading to an urge to 'do something' were also described in a self-mutilating subsampie of disturbed and dangerous male prisoners contained within a Californian special handling unit for the protection of staff and other inmates (Bach-y-Rita & Veno, 1974). Release of tension and anxiety was the most common explanation given for self-injury by subjects, similar to hospital sampies (see Simpson, 1980;Pattison & Kahan, 1983), but this was interpreted by Cookson as secondary to traumatic events in the prisoners' lives and the stress of imprisonment rather than a reflection of underlying psychopathology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…But, despite the emphasis on social environment, Ross and Mackay also noted that their subjects had posed special problems in other institutions before being sent to this training school, and were considered the 'failures' of the juvenile justice system. Interestingly, similar findings of uncontrollable tension leading to an urge to 'do something' were also described in a self-mutilating subsampie of disturbed and dangerous male prisoners contained within a Californian special handling unit for the protection of staff and other inmates (Bach-y-Rita & Veno, 1974). Release of tension and anxiety was the most common explanation given for self-injury by subjects, similar to hospital sampies (see Simpson, 1980;Pattison & Kahan, 1983), but this was interpreted by Cookson as secondary to traumatic events in the prisoners' lives and the stress of imprisonment rather than a reflection of underlying psychopathology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The direct association between brain injury and increased aggression, antisocial behaviour and offending are well documented [50][51][52], and the link between TBI and a significantly increased risk of violent crime has been seen longitudinally [53]. For decades' studies have been providing evidence that violent offenders are more likely than non-violent offenders to have a history of TBI or head injury with LOC for a prolonged period [54][55], and more recently the impact of TBI on earlier onset of violent offending and reconviction has been highlighted [56].…”
Section: Head Injury Violence and Self-harmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these studies, head injury was not the only reason for loss of consciousness but appears to have been the major cause. Rates for loss of consciousness in samples of violent individuals in forensic settings varied from a round half (Bach-y-Rita et al, 1971;Bach-y-Rita and Veno, 1974) to 75% (Mark and Ervin, 1970). Loss of consciousness is significant in this context especially if not transient, as indicating severity of head injury that might be expected to have at least some psychological consequences as a result of the brain injury involved.…”
Section: Head Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%