1966
DOI: 10.2307/3276368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Haemaphysalis (Dermaphysalis) nesomys subgen. et sp. n. (Ixodoidea, Ixodidae), a Leathery Parasite of Nesomys rufus Peters (Rodentia) in Madagascar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A great effort was undertaken by Harry Hoogstraal in the middle of the last century to characterize the haemaphysaline fauna of Madagascar. The original descriptions of H. elongata and H. simplex [ 64 ], H. obtusa [ 65 ] and H. hoodi madagascariensis [ 66 ] were complemented by the description of nine new species ( H. anoplos , H. eupleres , H. fossae , H. lemuris , H. nesomys , H. simplicima , H. subelongata , H. theilerae and H. tiptoni ) [ 39 – 43 ]. More recent studies [ 20 – 22 , 67 ] identified collected tick specimens based on these descriptions and complementary cox 1 gene sequences were generated for H. lemuris by Blanco et al [ 68 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A great effort was undertaken by Harry Hoogstraal in the middle of the last century to characterize the haemaphysaline fauna of Madagascar. The original descriptions of H. elongata and H. simplex [ 64 ], H. obtusa [ 65 ] and H. hoodi madagascariensis [ 66 ] were complemented by the description of nine new species ( H. anoplos , H. eupleres , H. fossae , H. lemuris , H. nesomys , H. simplicima , H. subelongata , H. theilerae and H. tiptoni ) [ 39 – 43 ]. More recent studies [ 20 – 22 , 67 ] identified collected tick specimens based on these descriptions and complementary cox 1 gene sequences were generated for H. lemuris by Blanco et al [ 68 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specimens damaged in relevant features were excluded from morphological measurements of the respective characteristic, leading to unequal sample sizes. Species identification was based on morphological characteristics if possible (ticks: [ 39 – 43 ]; lice: [ 44 – 46 ]; mites: [ 47 – 51 ]) and was complemented by an additional genetic analysis of a subset of samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%