1972
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(72)92594-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HÆMOGLOBIN SOUTHAMPTON, β106 (G8) Leu →Pro: AN UNSTABLE VARIANT PRODUCING SEVERE HÆMOLYSIS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

1973
1973
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This hemoglobin was first reported by Hyde et al. (2) , and then was reported in seven patients including two patients in the Argentines (3-8) , all due to de novo mutations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…This hemoglobin was first reported by Hyde et al. (2) , and then was reported in seven patients including two patients in the Argentines (3-8) , all due to de novo mutations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Hb Casper (Southampton) is the substitution of leucine 106 (G8) of the β-chain by proline, characterized as a de novo mutation in a handful of patients [3,4,5]. It consists of anemia, notable hemolysis and splenomegaly, along with recurrent infections with hemolytic crises [6], which our patient previously experienced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in 1973, separately described a new mutation that results in an unstable hemoglobin molecule [13,14]. The substitution of proline for leucine at beta 106 distorts the tertiary structure of hemoglobin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The substitution of proline for leucine at beta 106 distorts the tertiary structure of hemoglobin. The unstable hemoglobin precipitates within red blood cells, shortening their lifespan and causing severe hemolysis [13]. Subsequent cases of hemoglobin Southampton (Casper) have demonstrated similar clinical findings including progressive anemia, splenomegaly, hemolytic anemia, and Heinz bodies on blood smear [15,16,17,18,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%