2019
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.2646680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

hail-is/hail: 0.2.13

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, a study of a small number of rare binary phenotypes would be unlikely to benefit much from the indGWAS approach, as these phenotypes are unlikely to be well-approximated linearly with few features. Additionally, our comparison did not use highly optimized parallel implementations such as SAIGE implemented in Hail [15] or REGENIE in Glow [16]. Our implementation of indGWAS could also be improved, and the majority of its runtime is spent reading and writing GWAS summary statistics from disk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conversely, a study of a small number of rare binary phenotypes would be unlikely to benefit much from the indGWAS approach, as these phenotypes are unlikely to be well-approximated linearly with few features. Additionally, our comparison did not use highly optimized parallel implementations such as SAIGE implemented in Hail [15] or REGENIE in Glow [16]. Our implementation of indGWAS could also be improved, and the majority of its runtime is spent reading and writing GWAS summary statistics from disk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another limitation of the current study is that our runtime comparisons are certainly imperfect. Our comparison did not use highly optimized parallel implementations such as SAIGE implemented in Hail [11] or REGENIE in Glow [12]. Our implementation of Indirect GWAS could also be improved, and the majority of its runtime is spent reading and writing GWAS summary statistics from disk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%