2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hair pulling disorder and skin picking disorder have relatively limited associations with negative emotionality: A meta-analytic comparison across obsessive-compulsive and related disorders

Ivar Snorrason,
Jennie M. Kuckertz,
Valerie S. Swisher
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 57 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding supports the discriminant validity of the MGH-HPS; however, it also indicates that in the study sample hair-pulling was not with emotional distress. This observation is inconsistent with previous studies showing a high cooccurrence of TTM, depression and anxiety (e.g., Grant, et al, 2017;Houghton et al, 2016;Keuthen et al, 2016;Woods et al, 2006); however, it is in line with a recent metaanalysis showing the relatively limited association between trichotillomania and negative affectivity (Snorrason et al, 2023). It is plausible that the lack of correlational relationship yielded in the current study may be at least partially a consequence of the use of a small, non-clinical community sample.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This finding supports the discriminant validity of the MGH-HPS; however, it also indicates that in the study sample hair-pulling was not with emotional distress. This observation is inconsistent with previous studies showing a high cooccurrence of TTM, depression and anxiety (e.g., Grant, et al, 2017;Houghton et al, 2016;Keuthen et al, 2016;Woods et al, 2006); however, it is in line with a recent metaanalysis showing the relatively limited association between trichotillomania and negative affectivity (Snorrason et al, 2023). It is plausible that the lack of correlational relationship yielded in the current study may be at least partially a consequence of the use of a small, non-clinical community sample.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%