2012
DOI: 10.1248/bpb.35.582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hairless Modulates Ligand-Dependent Activation of the Vitamin D Receptor-Retinoid X Receptor Heterodimer

Abstract: 1) VDR acts as an allosteric transcription factor that undergoes a ligand-dependent conformational change in the cofactor binding site and activation function 2 (AF2) domain, structural rearrangements that result in dynamic interaction with the heterodimer partner retinoid X receptor (RXR; NR2B) and exchange of cofactor complexes.2,3) While corepressors bind to the VDR-RXR heterodimer in the absence of ligand, the ligand binding reduces the affinity of corepressors and increases the affinity for coactivators, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
6
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we have on rare occasions observed in select preparations of calcium-differentiated primary human keratinocytes, but never in KERTr cells, that 1,25D induces rather than represses both DKKL1 and SOSTDC1 expression (data not shown), suggesting that both the DKKL1 and SOSTDC1 VDREs should perhaps be referred to as “conditional”. This observation, probably accounted for by incomplete differentiation of occasional primary human keratinocyte lots, is also consistent with the recent finding that HR elicits coactivation of the cathelicidin gene while corepressing CYP24A1 mRNA in the context of HaCaT keratinocytes (Chuma , et al 2012). Finally, although no dramatic epidermal or hair cycle phenotype exists in either DkkL1 - or SOSTDC1 -knockout mice, the two gene products could redundantly regulate the hair cycle, requiring a double knockout to generate a hair cycle phenotype, or both gene products may possibly coordinate with other genes within the skin compartment to control hair growth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Moreover, we have on rare occasions observed in select preparations of calcium-differentiated primary human keratinocytes, but never in KERTr cells, that 1,25D induces rather than represses both DKKL1 and SOSTDC1 expression (data not shown), suggesting that both the DKKL1 and SOSTDC1 VDREs should perhaps be referred to as “conditional”. This observation, probably accounted for by incomplete differentiation of occasional primary human keratinocyte lots, is also consistent with the recent finding that HR elicits coactivation of the cathelicidin gene while corepressing CYP24A1 mRNA in the context of HaCaT keratinocytes (Chuma , et al 2012). Finally, although no dramatic epidermal or hair cycle phenotype exists in either DkkL1 - or SOSTDC1 -knockout mice, the two gene products could redundantly regulate the hair cycle, requiring a double knockout to generate a hair cycle phenotype, or both gene products may possibly coordinate with other genes within the skin compartment to control hair growth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…HR displays demethylase activity on both H3K9mel and H3K9me2, suggesting that HR can potentially exert opposing effects on its target gene expression. These findings explain the context‐dependent mode of gene regulation by HR, as reported previously (1618). For example, a recent study shows that HR acts not only as a transcriptional repressor but also as an activator in keratinocyte‐derived HaCaT cells in a gene‐selective manner (18).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…S3). Taken together with prior studies showing that HR can exert opposing effects on target gene activity, where it sometimes activates and sometimes represses (18), these results confirm that HR is a versatile transcription factor functioning through H3K9 demethylation, and its impact on target gene activity may vary in a gene‐specific and/or context‐dependent manner.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…It should be noted that most of our studies have been carried out in Skh:hr1 (hairless) mice, as this allows us to avoid artefacts associated with shaving. Although these mice have a mutation in hairless, a protein which binds to the VDR [31,32], we have reported similar effectiveness of 1,25D to reduce UVR-induced DNA damage in human keratinocytes and fibroblasts [33,34] and in people [29] as well as in various strains of mice [35]. We have also noted similar protection against UVR-induced reductions in contact hypersensitivity responses with 1,25D, in several other strains of mice, including female C57/ Bl6, BALB/C (in this test model at least) and C3h/HeN [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%