1983
DOI: 10.2172/6143418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Half life of /sup 26/Al

Abstract: Lunar March and Planetary Science XIV Conference! H~Ustont TX} 1983. DISCMMER O SCCOPMIW of WIII mew, tM DUDIIBW mcognuosml me I AS@ovornmsnl falmnt q MMICIU8W0, fovdIv.tfoo boom 10pubmh of mpmauco W~uohowa Wm Ot Ihls conlrlmoon, 0? 10 dloa mhom to 0000, fof U.S. O-mmoflt Owpaot. TfwLoB AlamoB NOIIOMI LoboIs!ov roouosl~Ml W BublW!of 100nWy lhls Orlk@ q1 wOtk @OwnOO unOOfW OIIOPWC01VW U,,~BQflmOnl ot RW@Y lLOSAhlililOS bSAla.OsNewMexic.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Norris et al 1983). This is congruent with a fast formation of planetesimals within 4 Ma (Huss et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…(Norris et al 1983). This is congruent with a fast formation of planetesimals within 4 Ma (Huss et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…At sufficiently large depths, production rates are negligible and as time proceeds, the 10 Be and 26 Al atoms in the sediment will decay at a rate defined by the radioactive half-life (36). The half-life of 10 Be is 1.387 ± 0.012 (37,38) while the half-life of 26 Al is 0.705±0.024 Ma (39). Burial dating with 10 Be and 26 Al, relies on the fact that both, the production rates and the half-lives of 10 Be and 26 Al are known, so that deviations from the steady exposure 26 Al/ 10 Be ratio of ~7:1 can be converted to a burial age.…”
Section: Burial Datingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For reference, the weighted mean of five determinations of the 26 Al halflife (Samworth et al, 1972;Norris et al, 1983;Middleton et al, 1983;Thomas et al, 1984) summarized by Nishiizumi (2004) is 0.715 ± 0.16 Ma, whereas the unweighted mean of these values is 0.720 ± 0.34 Ma (1r standard deviation). A lower value for t 1/2 ( 26 Al) = 0.705 ± 0.024 Ma (Norris et al, 1983) often is used in cosmogenic nuclide studies (cf. Nishiizumi, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%