1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0038-1098(98)00144-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hall effect of acceptor intercalation compounds in stages 1–3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the stage-2 IBr n = 8.1 × 10 26 m −3 and for stage-3 HgBr 2 n = 7.9 × 10 26 m −3 . These values are within the range of values 6.8 × 10 26 m −3 to 8.5 × 10 26 m −3 which has been reported for the low stages of chloride compounds [9].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the stage-2 IBr n = 8.1 × 10 26 m −3 and for stage-3 HgBr 2 n = 7.9 × 10 26 m −3 . These values are within the range of values 6.8 × 10 26 m −3 to 8.5 × 10 26 m −3 which has been reported for the low stages of chloride compounds [9].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Although a number of studies has been made of the electronic properties of donor compounds containing the alkali metals [2], a systematic knowledge of the transport properties of the acceptor GICs, especially with halogen molecules, is limited. Among these investigations the study of the resistivity of the AsF 5 GIC [3,4] and a wide range of studies of different stages of the SbCl 5 GIC [5,6], the electronic properties and structural phase transitions of the low stages of the ICl GICs [7,8] and the recent study of the Hall effect in the low stages of different chloride GICs [9] are mentioned here. To our knowledge, a rather small amount of work on the electronic properties of the bromide GICs has been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measured value of R H = (4.5 ± 0.05) × 10 −8 m 3 C −1 gives n = 1.4 × 10 26 m −3 . This is about one-sixth of those of most stage 2 and 3 GICs [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%