Hallucinations in the Child and Adolescent “Ultra-High Risk” population: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Background and Hypothesis Ultra-high risk for psychosis young adults are assumed to be at higher risk of developing a psychotic spectrum disorder. Predominantly, the ultra-high risk population is aged 18–35 years, but it may also include younger children and adolescents. Individuals in this population experience psychosis prodromes in the form of attenuated or brief psychotic symptoms (particularly perceptual abnormalities). Albeit diagnosis is made via structured interviews, such measures fail to sufficiently assess the precise form and content of perceptual abnormalities, especially as they manifest in children and adolescents. Study Design The present study involved a systematic review of the literature on perceptual abnormalities (particularly hallucinations) in ultra-high risk children and adolescents. Study Results The analysis reviewed five studies and drew conclusions about the perceptual abnormalities (i.e., hallucinations) experienced by the study samples, focusing on form, content, and associations with other symptoms. Of note, two of the investigated studies suggested a relationship between hallucinations and experiences of childhood trauma. Conclusions The transition to psychosis and experiences of childhood trauma could correspond to different types of hallucinations in ultra-high risk children and adolescents. This knowledge could improve the identification of prodromal states in the young, ultra-high risk population.

Mediation effect of insomnia symptoms between positive psychotic like experiences and suicidal ideation among Lebanese young adults

“…There were no fees for participating in the study. Participants were included if they: (1) were aged between 18–35 years (because the ultrahigh-risk for psychosis population predominantly belongs to this age range [ 69 ], (2) had no self-reported physician-diagnosis of mental illness, including psychosis, and (3) had no previous antipsychotic intake. Excluded were those who refused to complete the survey.…”

Schizotypal traits in a large sample of high-school and university students from Tunisia: correlates and measurement invariance of the arabic schizotypal personality questionnaire across age and sex

“…Unlike previous studies, female and older students scored higher in all three schizotypy dimensions (positive, negative and disorganized). The majority of previous research used data in adult samples of restricted [ 30 , 42 ] or large [ 40 , 68 ] age range; whereas we included students aged 12–35 years, because the at-risk for psychosis population predominantly belongs to this age range [ 110 ]. As such, one of the relatively new aspects of our study is the comparison of schizotypy severity between high-school and university student populations.…”

The relationship between cyberbullying perpetration/victimization and suicidal ideation in healthy young adults: the indirect effects of positive and negative psychotic experiences

“…The study followed a cross-sectional design, and was conducted during the period from June to September 2022. Participants were deemed eligible if they: (1) were aged 18–35 years (as the at-risk for psychosis population predominantly belongs to this age range [ 88 ]), (2) had no self-reported past history of mental illness, including psychosis (previously diagnosed by a mental health provider), (3) had no self-reported history of antipsychotic medication intake, and (4) consented to participate. Participants were excluded if they did not meet the four inclusion criteria.…”