2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Halo and subhalo demographics with Planck cosmological parameters: Bolshoi–Planck and MultiDark–Planck simulations

Abstract: We report and provide fitting functions for the abundance of dark matter halos and subhalos as a function of mass, circular velocity, and redshift from the new Bolshoi-Planck and MultiDark-Planck ΛCDM cosmological simulations, based on the Planck parameters. We also report halo mass accretion rates and concentrations. We show that the higher cosmological matter density of the Planck parameters compared with the WMAP parameters leads to higher abundance of massive halos at high redshifts. We find that the media… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
236
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(253 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
15
236
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Each column reflects a different halo mass range, while each row reflects a different halo property. We chose mass bins such that we could compare halos below, at, and above the characteristic mass M C of halos that are collapsing at z = 0, which is 10 12.70 M = 5.0 × 10 12 M for the Planck cosmological parameters used in the Bolshoi-Planck simulation (see Rodríguez-Puebla et al 2016, Figure 9, for a plot showing M C as a function of redshift). For each panel, different lines represent different smoothing radii used to determine the local density around halos.…”
Section: Correlations At the Present Epochmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each column reflects a different halo mass range, while each row reflects a different halo property. We chose mass bins such that we could compare halos below, at, and above the characteristic mass M C of halos that are collapsing at z = 0, which is 10 12.70 M = 5.0 × 10 12 M for the Planck cosmological parameters used in the Bolshoi-Planck simulation (see Rodríguez-Puebla et al 2016, Figure 9, for a plot showing M C as a function of redshift). For each panel, different lines represent different smoothing radii used to determine the local density around halos.…”
Section: Correlations At the Present Epochmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have adopted a baryon fraction of 0.1578. Our cosmology is consistent with the Planck 2013 results (Planck Collaboration et al 2014) and was chosen to match that of the Bolshoi Planck simulation (Rodriguez-Puebla et al 2016). We use CANDELS mock lightcones (Somerville et al in prep.…”
Section: The Semi-analytic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use CANDELS mock lightcones (Somerville et al in prep. ) extracted from the Bolshoi Planck dark-matter N-body simulation Trujillo-Gomez et al 2011;Rodriguez-Puebla et al 2016). The ROCKSTAR algorithm of Behroozi et al (2013a) is used to identify dark matter halos.…”
Section: The Semi-analytic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To calculate M * , we follow a similar procedure of the one presented in Rodríguez-Puebla et al 2016 to calculate the characteristic mass of halos just collapsing at redshift z (M C ). This is shown in Appendix A.…”
Section: Evolution In the Direction Of The Am Vectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we present the procedure to calculate M * , following the work of (Rodríguez-Puebla et al 2016) for the calculation of M C :…”
Section: Appendix A: Calculation Of M *mentioning
confidence: 99%