2008
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1137885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Halo Effect in Trust

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies (e.g., Lee, Han, & Nayga, 2014;Natarajan, 2009;Palmer & Feldman, 2005) found that it arises when raters, customers, and students are influenced by a good impression. Overgeneralization is another type of cognitive bias that may occur when a person generalizes feelings and thoughts about a person or groups, issues, or situations, based on a single example or one set of positive or negative experiences.…”
Section: Positive Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies (e.g., Lee, Han, & Nayga, 2014;Natarajan, 2009;Palmer & Feldman, 2005) found that it arises when raters, customers, and students are influenced by a good impression. Overgeneralization is another type of cognitive bias that may occur when a person generalizes feelings and thoughts about a person or groups, issues, or situations, based on a single example or one set of positive or negative experiences.…”
Section: Positive Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As a cognitive bias, the halo effect occurs when people rate a person's performance, personality traits, or specific behaviors based on their overall or previous good impressions or judgments about the person. Previous studies (e.g., Lee, Han, & Nayga, ; Natarajan, ; Palmer & Feldman, ) found that it arises when raters, customers, and students are influenced by a good impression. Overgeneralization is another type of cognitive bias that may occur when a person generalizes feelings and thoughts about a person or groups, issues, or situations, based on a single example or one set of positive or negative experiences.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 98%