2009
DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/27/1/015006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hamilton–Jacobi tunneling method for dynamical horizons in different coordinate gauges

Abstract: Previous work on dynamical black hole instability is further elucidated within the Hamilton–Jacobi method for horizon tunneling and the reconstruction of the classical action by means of the null expansion method. Everything is based on two natural requirements, namely that the tunneling rate is an observable and therefore it must be based on invariantly defined quantities, and that coordinate systems which do not cover the horizon should not be admitted. These simple observations can help to clarify some ambi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
148
0
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
9
148
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…As showed in [16], this result is invariant since the quantities appearing in the imaginary part are manifestly invariant. As a consequence, we may interpret T = −κ H /2π as the dynamical temperature associated with FRW space-times.…”
Section: Horizon Tunnelingmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As showed in [16], this result is invariant since the quantities appearing in the imaginary part are manifestly invariant. As a consequence, we may interpret T = −κ H /2π as the dynamical temperature associated with FRW space-times.…”
Section: Horizon Tunnelingmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…We recall that in previous papers [15,16] we considered the quantum instability of dynamical black holes using a variant of the tunneling method introduced by Parikh and Wilczek in the static case to uncover aspects of back-reaction effects [20]. These approaches are based on WKB relativistic method (see, for example [21] and more recently [22]) and only the leading terms of the production rate probability are taken into account, leaving untouched the pre-factor evaluation.…”
Section: The Kodama-hayward Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations