2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.94.104045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hamiltonian formulation of teleparallel gravity

Abstract: The Hamiltonian formulation of the teleparallel equivalent of general relativity (TEGR) is developed from an ordinary second-order Lagrangian, which is written as a quadratic form of the coefficients of anholonomy of the orthonormal frames (vielbeins). We analyze the structure of eigenvalues of the multi-index matrix entering the (linear) relation between canonical velocities and momenta to obtain the set of primary constraints. The canonical Hamiltonian is then built with the Moore-Penrose pseudo-inverse of t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
107
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Actually, it was clear since the early developments in the field that the local action of the Lorentz group on a given solution E a (x) of the f (T ) motion equations leads to another tetrad E a ′ = Λ a ′ a (x)E a , which is not generally a solution, even though both of them generate the same metric tensor g = η ab E a E b . This is basically because the equations of motion determine more degrees of freedom than those captured by the metric tensor [14]; some attempts have been made for capturing the number and nature of these degrees of freedom through Hamiltonian analysis [3,4], conformal transformations [15,16], cosmological perturbations [17][18][19][20], among others. The extra degree(s) of freedom define the space-time structure by means of a parallelization, which fixes the tetrad components modulo certain remnant symmetries associated with the specific solution under consideration [21].…”
Section: Modified Teleparallel Gravitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, it was clear since the early developments in the field that the local action of the Lorentz group on a given solution E a (x) of the f (T ) motion equations leads to another tetrad E a ′ = Λ a ′ a (x)E a , which is not generally a solution, even though both of them generate the same metric tensor g = η ab E a E b . This is basically because the equations of motion determine more degrees of freedom than those captured by the metric tensor [14]; some attempts have been made for capturing the number and nature of these degrees of freedom through Hamiltonian analysis [3,4], conformal transformations [15,16], cosmological perturbations [17][18][19][20], among others. The extra degree(s) of freedom define the space-time structure by means of a parallelization, which fixes the tetrad components modulo certain remnant symmetries associated with the specific solution under consideration [21].…”
Section: Modified Teleparallel Gravitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the geometry of spacetime is assumed to be torsionless by employing the Levi-Civita connection, which is torsionless by definition. While this is the most popular formulation, there exists an alternative but mathematically equivalent formulation called teleparallel gravity [1,2,3], differing from general relativity only by a boundary term. In this formulation, one instead uses the Weitzenböck connection, which is flat by definition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The connection is called Weitzenböck connection and has torsion but vanishing curvature. For a certain choice of a Lagrangian quadratic in this torsion, the theory reduces to the so-called Teleparallel Equivalent of General Relativity (TEGR) [5][6][7][8][9], whose dynamical equations are equivalent to those of GR [10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. A decade ago, a novel approach to modified gravity was proposed by using TEGR as a starting point: the so-called f (T ) gravity [17,18], which mimics the proposal of f (R) gravity by extending the Lagrangian through an arbitrary function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%