2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejc.2012.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hamming dimension of a graph—The case of Sierpiński graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sierpinski gasket graphs S n [28] are associated with the Sierpinski gasket -well-known topological fractal with a Hausdorff dimension log(3)/ log(2) ≈ 1.585. Edges of S n are line segments of the n-th approximation of the Sierpinski gasket, and vertices are intersection points of these segments (Fig.…”
Section: Sierpinski Gasket Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sierpinski gasket graphs S n [28] are associated with the Sierpinski gasket -well-known topological fractal with a Hausdorff dimension log(3)/ log(2) ≈ 1.585. Edges of S n are line segments of the n-th approximation of the Sierpinski gasket, and vertices are intersection points of these segments (Fig.…”
Section: Sierpinski Gasket Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here K = ∆(G) + 1 is an upper bound on the Hausdorff dimension of the graph G. The binary variable x i,k indicates whether the clique C i is colored by a color k, and the binary variable y k indicates whether the color k is used; the relation between these variables is enforced by the constraints (26). The constraints (28) state that every clique receives at most one color; it is possible that a clique does not have any color, which means that a clique is not selected as a cluster. By the constraints (28), all cliques containing any given vertex v receive different colors, and the constraints (29) ensure that at least one of the cliques covering any edge uv receives a color (i.e.…”
Section: Calculation Of Lebesgue and Hausdorff Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, those graphs have been called Sierpiński graphs in [7] and they were studied by now from numerous points of view. The reader is invited to read, for instance, the following recent papers [2,5,4,7,8,9] and references therein. This construction was generalized in [3] for any graph G, by defining the t-th generalized Sierpiński graph of G, denoted by S(G, t), as the graph with vertex set V t (G) and edge set defined as follows.…”
Section: Preliminaries On Generalized Sierpiński Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In those publications, geometric objects were considered as one of the types of fractals [33]. Later, in the 2000s, publications appeared offering definitions of Sierpinski graphs from the classical point of view, when a graph is given sets of vertices and edges [34][35][36]. Recently, researchers have proposed a uniform definition of Sierpinski graphs [37,38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%