2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12178-020-09623-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hamstring Autograft for Lateral Ligament Stabilization

Abstract: Purpose of Review This paper seeks to review the current literature and trends regarding use of hamstring autograft for lateral ankle instability. Recent Findings Reconstruction of the lateral ankle ligaments using hamstring autograft has been found to be an effective method to treat ankle instability in terms of patient-reported outcomes and objective measures. Biomechanically, reconstruction has been shown to be stronger (load to failure) when compared with the Broström procedure. Clinical studies have demon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Failure rates after primary repair of the lateral ankle ligaments utilizing a modified Brostrom-Gould technique are 45.2% as opposed to 10.8% in patients without generalized ligamentous laxity 52. But, even in the setting of ligamentous laxity, the use of hamstring autograft as opposed to allograft is not contraindicated 51,54…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Failure rates after primary repair of the lateral ankle ligaments utilizing a modified Brostrom-Gould technique are 45.2% as opposed to 10.8% in patients without generalized ligamentous laxity 52. But, even in the setting of ligamentous laxity, the use of hamstring autograft as opposed to allograft is not contraindicated 51,54…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…52 But, even in the setting of ligamentous laxity, the use of hamstring autograft as opposed to allograft is not contraindicated. 51,54 Anteroposterior and lateral stress radiographs performed using protective lead gloves and manually applying anterior drawer and talar tilt stress or placing the patient in a Telos stress device 17 decanewtons of stress allow for objective measurements of ankle laxity. In patients with talar tilt > 20 degree or anterior drawer > 15 mm, reconstruction is recommended in favor of primary repair.…”
Section: Clinical Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ankle ligament reconstruction was indicated in patients with CLAI who were refractory to non-operative treatment consisting of targeted physiotherapy focused on proprioception and peroneal strengthening for a minimum of 3 months [ 2 ] or in revision cases after failed direct ligament repair. Furthermore, for the classification as a “high-risk” case, the presence of one of the following risk factors was required: generalized ligamentous hyperlaxity, insufficient soft tissue and/or high-demand athletes (participation in pivoting sports and/or athletic activity of more than 60 min, at least 3 week) [ 37 ]. For assessment of general laxity, the Beighton score was collected, with values ≥ 4 indicating generalized hyperlaxity [ 42 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, suboptimal outcomes have been reported in patient populations especially at risk due to high intensity athletic or occupational activities [ 11 ], generalized hyperlaxity [ 47 ], high-grade instability with insufficient substance of native ligament structures [ 2 , 23 ], or in revision cases [ 19 ]. In these situations, surgical management with tendon graft-based anatomic lateral ankle ligament reconstruction has been advocated [ 37 ]. While there exists no surgical consensus to date concerning optimal fibular tunnel configuration and graft choice, both allograft- [ 5 , 7 , 8 , 16 , 21 , 31 , 34 ] as well as autograft-based techniques [ 3 , 33 ] have demonstrated to reliably restore stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reconstruction of the anterior talo bular ligament and calcaneo bular ligament is considered critical in the treatment of lateral ankle injuries because the lateral collateral ligaments are di cult to suture during long-term disease progression or the soft tissues used for strengthening and repair are di cult to utilize. Currently, arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior talo bular ligament and calcaneo bular ligament is an important modality for the treatment of chronic ankle instability, and has been used with good clinical results since [3].Many studies have found that the tibio bular anterior ligament has a rich distribution of proprioceptors [4,5],and it has been reported that reconstruction using autologous tendon grafts can achieve good results [6][7][8].Because the distal bula is thin and there is a risk of fracture of the distal bula during reconstruction, the establishment of the bone tract should also be a consideration for the surgeon. Anatomic reconstruction of the ligament has also been proposed in recent years [9], but the question of whether the stump of the anterior tibio bular ligament should be preserved intraoperatively is still inconclusive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%