2008
DOI: 10.2466/pms.107.3.643-650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hand and Hand Preferences in Use of a Visual Analogue Scale'

Abstract: Visual analogue scales are commonly used to measure the intensity of sensations, and their validity and reliability have been reported. However, biases similar to those found in visual line bisection have not been investigated. 23 right-handed and 19 left-handed participants, with a mean age of 30.1 yr., marked three points on a visual analogue scale representing imagined pain, using both the left and right hands, corresponding to 1/4, 1/2, and 3/4 of the way across the scale. In keeping with visual line bisec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Visual Analogue Scales are commonly used to measure the intensity of subjective sensations such as pain [14,15]. We measured satisfaction, pain, and stiffness of the thumb as well as ADL impairment with this tool.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual Analogue Scales are commonly used to measure the intensity of subjective sensations such as pain [14,15]. We measured satisfaction, pain, and stiffness of the thumb as well as ADL impairment with this tool.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conceptualization of such a score is also subject to inter-patient differences. 17 In addition, marking a visual analogue scale is subject to changes due to hand and hand preferences, 20 and the act of making a mark on a horizontal line, such as a visual analogue scale, can be influenced by sex. 21 Thus, a variety of factors may potentially contribute to uncertainty concerning the validity of assessments of perceptions obtained by marking a visual analogue scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%