1983
DOI: 10.1086/494025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hand, Brain, and Heart: A Feminist Epistemology for the Natural Sciences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
161
0
16

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 322 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
161
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Feminist standpoint perspective was initially advanced by writers such as Hartsock (1983Hartsock ( , 1987, Rose (1983Rose ( , 1986, and Smith (1979Smith ( , 1987, and is based on the notion that human activity structures and sets limits on understanding (Harding 1989). Underpinning the standpoint position is the view that the dominance of conceptual schemes based on male perspectives of the social world has produced a partial and distorted understanding of events, which can only be redressed by uncovering an understanding of the world from the perspective of women's activities (Harding 1989).^ Earlier theoretical models of patriarchy constructing it as a kind of universal oppression were seen to understate differences among women's experiences in terms of class, race, sexual identity and so on.…”
Section: Methodological Stancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feminist standpoint perspective was initially advanced by writers such as Hartsock (1983Hartsock ( , 1987, Rose (1983Rose ( , 1986, and Smith (1979Smith ( , 1987, and is based on the notion that human activity structures and sets limits on understanding (Harding 1989). Underpinning the standpoint position is the view that the dominance of conceptual schemes based on male perspectives of the social world has produced a partial and distorted understanding of events, which can only be redressed by uncovering an understanding of the world from the perspective of women's activities (Harding 1989).^ Earlier theoretical models of patriarchy constructing it as a kind of universal oppression were seen to understate differences among women's experiences in terms of class, race, sexual identity and so on.…”
Section: Methodological Stancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main role of the public is to contribute an informed opinion about emerging technoscientific issues or new research agendas. 24 See the historical work of P. Smith (2006) which demonstrates how artisans and artists, sculptors, locksmiths and carpenters were key actors in the formation of modern science; see also the important work of H. Rose (1983). The political implications of craftsmanship for contemporary radical social movements are partly discussed in Carlsson (2008).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por último, trabajos recientes desde perspectivas feministas discuten el objeto de estudio de la biología y el sistema de valores en que los conocimientos biológicos se fundamentan o la dicotomía naturaleza-cultura (Mukherjee, 2016;Pérez, 1996;Rose, 1983), abriendo oportunidades para resignificar el área y quebrar esa dicotomía, (traducida a nuestro tema de interés como sexo-género) que tradicionalmente caracteriza la disciplina.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified