2019
DOI: 10.1002/icd.2136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hand selection for role‐differentiated bimanual manipulation in a beading task: An assessment of typically developing children

Abstract: Role‐differentiated bimanual manipulation (RDBM) is observed in many daily tasks. The preferred hand manipulates the object, whereas the nonpreferred hand stabilizes it. In this study, RDBM was assessed in 3‐ to 12‐year‐olds and young adults with a beading task. The number of trials where participants selected the preferred hand to grasp the thread and the number of hand switches (from thread to bead, or vice versa) in each trial (two beads/trial, six trials total) were recorded. No differences in the number o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary, however, we did not find a relationship between interhemispheric connections and coupling for RD-L. In daily life role-differentiated bimanual tasks, object stabilization by the non-dominant and manipulation by the dominant hand is the preferred pattern of division of labour (Benson & Bryden, 2019;Guiard, 1987;Rudisch et al, 2018). A potential explanation for the missing relationship in RD-L (as compared to RD-R) might be that RD-L reflects that preferred division of labour and, as such, a more skilled coordination between hands.…”
Section: Relationship Between Trcoh and Behaviourcontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Contrary, however, we did not find a relationship between interhemispheric connections and coupling for RD-L. In daily life role-differentiated bimanual tasks, object stabilization by the non-dominant and manipulation by the dominant hand is the preferred pattern of division of labour (Benson & Bryden, 2019;Guiard, 1987;Rudisch et al, 2018). A potential explanation for the missing relationship in RD-L (as compared to RD-R) might be that RD-L reflects that preferred division of labour and, as such, a more skilled coordination between hands.…”
Section: Relationship Between Trcoh and Behaviourcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Antiphase coordination modes have been shown to be less stable, and phase transitions (from antiphase to inphase) occur typically at critical frequencies that may be altered, for example, with increasing cognitive load (Temprado et al, 2001). This paradigm, however, does not resemble the typical role‐differentiated tasks of our daily life (Babik & Michel, 2016; Benson & Bryden, 2019; Rudisch et al, 2018), for example, opening a bottle or pouring water in a glass; it rather represents cyclical movement tasks. For example, when opening a container with one hand and retrieving something from it with the other hand, both hands are involved in a common task but perform disparate subtasks (Rudisch et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We observed a better performance for the left over the right hand when performing the constant force production task in the asymmetric condition and the reverse when performing the alternating task. Lateralization of the hands is assumed to result from asymmetric specialization due to different task demands for the dominant and non-dominant hand (Guiard, 1987;Wang and Sainburg, 2007), which is part of motor development (Rudisch et al, 2018;Scharoun Benson and Bryden, 2019). Typically, during asymmetric tasks, the non-dominant hand preferentially performs the stabilizing part of the movement (as required in our asymmetric task with left hand constant) whereas the dominant hand is used for manipulation (Guiard, 1987) (as required in our asymmetric task with right hand alternating).…”
Section: Executing Handmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We know from longitudinal work examining block building from toddlerhood through age 6 that stacking success continues to increase in complexity, and that the child's stacking experience, measured as time spent in activity, is linked to stacking complexity (Hanline et al., 2001). In a related construction activity involving stringing beads rather than stacking, Scharoun Benson and Bryden (2019) reported differences in strategies across age from 3 to 12 years old that may be related to handedness. Thus, there are several avenues to pursue regarding stacking strategy that could yield additional insight.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%