2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00068-007-6183-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hand Trauma Pitfalls: A Retrospective Study of Fight Bites

Abstract: Clench fist or fight bite injuries are associated with some of the worst types of infective complications but their mechanism is often poorly understood. In a retrospective case series, 34 patients seen between 1998 and 2004 presented to a local hand surgery unit with confirmed human bite hand injuries. Seventy-six percent presented with infective complications with a mean delay in presentation of 4 days. Eighty percent of patients were clench fist injuries (CFI) (open joints in 59% and tendon injuries in 63%)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our series, the vast majority of infections occurred after trauma, such as injuries related to job or household activities or animal bites. Of interest and in contrast to other reports [15], no fight bite was noted within our cohort.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…In our series, the vast majority of infections occurred after trauma, such as injuries related to job or household activities or animal bites. Of interest and in contrast to other reports [15], no fight bite was noted within our cohort.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…14,15 Specifically, delay to presentation has been associated with longer duration of admission, necessity of multiple operative debridements, and a higher incidence of osteomyelitis. 16 The limitations of this study include its retrospective nature and the lack of long-term follow-up. Unfortunately this is to be expected given the high rate of loss to follow-up in this patient population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Our amputation rates are low at only 1.6%, but other recent studies have also identified low amputation rates possibly due to increased awareness of the injury. 3,13,14) This study suffered from some limitations. The data was collected retrospectively and when originally collected was not done so in a standardised manner possibly introducing information bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%