2018
DOI: 10.1002/mp.13198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hand‐wrist, knee, and foot‐ankle dosimetry and image quality measurements of a novel extremity imaging unit providing CBCT and 2D imaging options

Abstract: CBCT effective doses calculated from anthropomorphic phantom exposures following manufacturer suggested protocols appear to be substantially less than previously reported doses for similar MDCT extremity examinations. In this study, effective dose from 2D radiographic imaging was approximately two orders of magnitude less than CBCT imaging. Doses were on the order of a few minutes to hours of ubiquitous per-capita background dose for 2D imaging and a few hours to days for 3D imaging. Dose significantly increas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average dose of an ankle or wrist X-ray is estimated to be 0.001–0.06 μSv [ 17 ]. Though low compared to other imaging modalities, this avoidable radiation dosage theoretically leads to an increased risk of cancer [ 18 ] and is often a source of concern for patients [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average dose of an ankle or wrist X-ray is estimated to be 0.001–0.06 μSv [ 17 ]. Though low compared to other imaging modalities, this avoidable radiation dosage theoretically leads to an increased risk of cancer [ 18 ] and is often a source of concern for patients [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons, radiographic angles were shown to be not repeatable, resulting in unreliable clinical studies 53 known as "intrinsic imprecision." 54 Some modern medical imaging devices now allow CT scans in weight-bearing, 6,7 finally giving access to thorough 3D geometric measurements of the foot and ankle bones under load. Because this condition was accessible for decades only for planar radiograph images, 11,55 novel 3D measures of the overall foot bone architecture now need to be defined carefully and established in the biomechanical and clinical communities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These devices can now provide 3D images in loading conditions (weight-bearing computed tomography [WBCT]). This fundamental new feature offers relatively low radiation, high spatial resolution, and convenient ergonomy, [5][6][7][8][9][10] and as such it may have a promising role in making more precise diagnoses and assessments in various applications in orthopaedics and musculoskeletal disorders. In particular, the foot, ankle, and knee, but also the hand, wrist, and elbow, can finally benefit from this equipment because weight-bearing situations are fundamental to comprehend the functional mechanisms of these anatomical structures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These modern CBCT devices can provide 3D scans in weight-bearing, which is particularly valuable for foot and ankle studies 20 24 . This new feature adds to the demonstrated relatively low radiation, high spatial resolution, and convenient ergonomy and post-processing 13 , 25 29 , making this technology fundamental nowadays in many clinical studies 6 , 7 , 10 , 12 16 , 20 23 , 26 28 , 30 . The load can be modulated from case to case, ranging from standard single- or double-leg up-right postures to other postural conditions with the leg under determined and controlled positions 13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%