1988
DOI: 10.54991/jop.1988.1609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handapaphyllum- A new leaf type from the upper permian of Orissa, India

Abstract: A new genus Handapaphyllum is established for fan-shaped, petiolar leaves having symmetrically lobed and dissected lamina with 6-8 dichotomous parallel running veins from the Kamthi Formation of Handapa, Orissa.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consideration of such leaves under this group is also tentative as there are no reproductive structures or cuticular details to support their identification. Such ginkgoalean remains are more common in the extra-peninsular region than in the peninsular region, where their occurrence is sporadic The fossil re ma i ns of Ginkgophyllu In, PIa typhyllu In, Gondwanopbyton and Handapaphyllu m (Chandra & Singh, 1989) are reported from the Barakar and the Kamthi formations of the peninsular India With the present state of knowledge, it is very difficult to comment on the habit of the plants of thiS group. It can only be summarized on the basis of their sporadic occurrence that they grew in pockets and never formed a conspicuous vegetation of the forest in any formation.…”
Section: Coniferales-conifersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consideration of such leaves under this group is also tentative as there are no reproductive structures or cuticular details to support their identification. Such ginkgoalean remains are more common in the extra-peninsular region than in the peninsular region, where their occurrence is sporadic The fossil re ma i ns of Ginkgophyllu In, PIa typhyllu In, Gondwanopbyton and Handapaphyllu m (Chandra & Singh, 1989) are reported from the Barakar and the Kamthi formations of the peninsular India With the present state of knowledge, it is very difficult to comment on the habit of the plants of thiS group. It can only be summarized on the basis of their sporadic occurrence that they grew in pockets and never formed a conspicuous vegetation of the forest in any formation.…”
Section: Coniferales-conifersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P ermian sediments pertaining to the Talcher Coalfield, Ib-River Coalfield and Mand-Raigarh Coalfield, all parts of the Mahanadi Basin, have been thoroughly investigated by a number of workers over the past fifty years {Subramanian and Rao (1960); Khan (1969); Surange and Maheshwari (1970); Chandra (1973a, b, c, 1974a, b, c, d); Maithy (1977); Chandra and Surange (1977); Chandra andRigby (1981, 1983); Chandra (1984); Pant et al (1985); Chandra and Singh (1986, 1988, 1989; Singh and Chandra (1987, 1990, b, 1999, 2000; ; Goswami and Singh (2010); Goswami et al (2006a, b); Singh et al, (2003Singh et al, ( , b, c, 2007}. However, a very important coalfield within the Mahanadi Basin, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equivalent formations are Nishatbagh and Mamal (Kashmir Valley, Pir Panjal and ParauthochtOne), KhelongjRilu (eastern Himalaya). After the initial report of plant fossils from the Raniganj Coalfield (Brongniart, 1828), mega-and micro-fossils have been reported from almost all the horizons (see Lakhanpal, Maheshwari & Awasthi, 1976;Chandra & Singh, 1989;Maheshwari, Singh & Bajpai, 1989;Bajpai & Tewari, 1990;Chandra, Srivastava & Singh, 1990;Prasad & Maithy, 1990;Singh & Bajpai, 1990;Singh & Chandra, 1990;Bajpai & Maheshwari, 1991;Chandra & Tewari, 1991;Srivastava, 1991;Kapoor, Bajpai & Maheshwari, 1992;Maheshwari & Bajpai, 1992, etc. ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%