Handbook of Good Psychiatric Management for Adolescents With Borderline Personality Disorder

Usher, Craigan

doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2021.08.013

Cited by 2 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Three qualitative (Koehne et al, 2013; O'Connor & McNicholas, 2020; Papadopoullos et al, 2022), three quantitative (Courtney & Makinen, 2016; Griffiths, 2011; Laurenssen et al, 2013) and two mixed methods (Brand‐Gothelf et al, 2021; Vickers et al, 2022) studies supported this theme. The question of whether a diagnosis accurately reflects a person's psychological state is evident in studies across all groups of participants (YP, primary caregivers, and professionals).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 92%

“…Others identified that giving the diagnosis suggested that there was ‘something not right’ with YP (Staniford & Lister, 2021, p.249), rather than recognising that they have often been the victim of maltreatment. Interestingly, studies that focused on YP found that they often felt that the diagnosis was the most accurate way to describe their symptoms (Courtney & Makinen, 2016).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Stigma was discussed throughout most studies, five qualitative (Koehne et al, 2013; O'Connor & McNicholas, 2020; Papadopoullos et al, 2022; Staniford & Lister, 2021; Viduani et al, 2022), three quantitative (Courtney & Makinen, 2016; Griffiths, 2011; Laurenssen et al, 2013) and three mixed methods (Brand‐Gothelf et al, 2021; Kearney et al, 2011; Vickers et al, 2022). Frequently, professionals have identified that they feel that a psychiatric diagnosis often includes pejorative or value judgements, which can further stigmatise patients and 'color' perspectives about them (Brand‐Gothelf et al, 2021; Griffiths, 2011; Laurenssen et al, 2013; Papadopoullos et al, 2022; Staniford & Lister, 2021; Vickers et al, 2022).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…YP's experiences were directly related to acceptance of diagnoses and perception of self, where they identified themselves as 'crazy' or 'untreatable' (O'Connor & McNicholas, 2020; Papadopoullos et al, 2022; Staniford & Lister, 2021; Viduani et al, 2022). However, Courtney and Makinen (2016) found that YP were more likely to notice being treated differently by caregivers following a psychiatric diagnosis than by professionals. This may be explained by O'Connor and McNicholas (2020) finding that caregivers experience stigma because of their child's diagnosis.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Scores of 50–70% were considered relatively low quality, 71–84% were considered mid‐quality, with scores of 85% and above judged as high quality. Although there were three papers (Courtney & Makinen, 2016; Griffiths, 2011; Kearney et al, 2011) which had low‐quality ratings, they were included in the study due to the otherwise limited literature. Two independent raters reviewed the quality of each included study and were broadly in agreement; any differences in quality rating were discussed and resolved.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

A mixed‐method systematic review of the perspectives of young people, carers and professionals on psychiatric diagnosis in childhood and adolescence

Gill,

Jones,

Price

et al. 2024

Child Adoles Psych Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ProblemThe significance and complexities of a psychiatric diagnosis have been well‐documented in existing literature. Despite the reliability and accuracy of such diagnoses, the impact and use of diagnostic labelling on young people remains unclear.MethodsA systematic review was conducted using six databases, identifying 13 studies that explored psychiatric diagnosis experiences in professionals, caregivers, and young people.FindingsThis review focuses on three main themes related to psychiatric diagnosis in young people. The first theme is diagnostic subjectivity, which explores the accuracy, usefulness, potential harm and alternatives (e.g. psychological formulation) to psychiatric diagnosis in this population. The second theme is the utility of psychiatric diagnosis, which considers whether it helps young people access appropriate support and gain a better understanding of themselves and their presenting issues. The third theme is stigma, which examines the negative experiences and discrimination that young people may face due to their psychiatric diagnosis.ConclusionsThere is relatively limited literature which discusses the experience of psychiatric diagnosis in young people, caregivers and professionals. The available literature is difficult to compare due to discrepancies between methodologies and services, and there are several gaps i.e. a limited focus on the experience of young people themselves. Different views and experiences of psychiatric diagnosis among professionals, caregivers, and young people could impact young people's quality of life, access to healthcare, and identity development. The current literature needs to be more comprehensive to draw firm conclusions about young people's experiences with psychiatric diagnosis.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 92%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A mixed‐method systematic review of the perspectives of young people, carers and professionals on psychiatric diagnosis in childhood and adolescence

Gill,

Jones,

Price

et al. 2024

Child Adoles Psych Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Development of the Impact of Diagnosis Scale–Revised (IODS-R)

Arnold,

Huang,

Lawson

et al. 2023

Assessment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

No tools quantify the experience, psychological, and practical impact of receiving a diagnosis from a non-deficit perspective. Autism is increasingly late diagnosed in adulthood. The Impact of Diagnosis Scale (IODS) was initially developed for borderline personality disorder. We aimed to develop a revised version suitable for autistic adults and potentially other diagnostic groups. Following a trial of a preliminary revision, the researchers and autistic research advisors co-produced an expanded pool of 46 items, scored on 7-point Likert-type scale, within 6 hypothesized domains. Scale reduction processes were applied to data from 125 formally diagnosed autistic adults. Following iterative rounds of factor analysis using maximum likelihood estimation with Promax rotation, 22 items were retained across 4 domains to comprise the IODS-R. The IODS-R adds new understanding to the experience of receiving an autism diagnosis in adulthood. It may be useful for evaluating diagnostic services and other diagnostic groups.

show abstract

Handbook of Good Psychiatric Management for Adolescents With Borderline Personality Disorder

Cited by 2 publications

References 8 publications

A mixed‐method systematic review of the perspectives of young people, carers and professionals on psychiatric diagnosis in childhood and adolescence

A mixed‐method systematic review of the perspectives of young people, carers and professionals on psychiatric diagnosis in childhood and adolescence

Development of the Impact of Diagnosis Scale–Revised (IODS-R)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About