2023
DOI: 10.1201/9781003259183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handbook of Nanoencapsulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a suitable technique for dehydration of heat-sensitive foods and microencapsulation (Desai and Park, 2005), its operations stabilize the material through four stages, firstly freezing of the core and wall material, sublimation of the lodged water avoiding friction with oxygen, desorption and finally storage (Ezhilarasi et al, 2013). Some of its advantages are related to low water activity, inhibiting the proliferation of microorganisms and improving the firmness of the microcapsules (Figueiredo et al, 2022); the technique is feasible to microencapsulate compounds intolerant to high temperatures, in addition to having a low oxidation rate (Kour et al, 2023); however, its disadvantages include the operation time (up to 20 h) and the production of porous spherical structures that cause rehydration of the microcapsules and, consequently, increased moisture (Karthik and Anandharamakrishnan, 2012). Wang et al (2017) microencapsulated heme iron using maltodextrin, Although all five techniques indicate different advantages over microcapsule formation, spray drying is considered the leading technique for protecting any excipient, including minerals, with its main advantage being the formation of microcapsules that meet physical properties (efficiency, moisture, bioavailability, and performance) that are stable in processing, packaging, distribution and storage; this is achieved by properly optimizing dry powders in formulations prior to producing microcapsules.…”
Section: Lyophilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a suitable technique for dehydration of heat-sensitive foods and microencapsulation (Desai and Park, 2005), its operations stabilize the material through four stages, firstly freezing of the core and wall material, sublimation of the lodged water avoiding friction with oxygen, desorption and finally storage (Ezhilarasi et al, 2013). Some of its advantages are related to low water activity, inhibiting the proliferation of microorganisms and improving the firmness of the microcapsules (Figueiredo et al, 2022); the technique is feasible to microencapsulate compounds intolerant to high temperatures, in addition to having a low oxidation rate (Kour et al, 2023); however, its disadvantages include the operation time (up to 20 h) and the production of porous spherical structures that cause rehydration of the microcapsules and, consequently, increased moisture (Karthik and Anandharamakrishnan, 2012). Wang et al (2017) microencapsulated heme iron using maltodextrin, Although all five techniques indicate different advantages over microcapsule formation, spray drying is considered the leading technique for protecting any excipient, including minerals, with its main advantage being the formation of microcapsules that meet physical properties (efficiency, moisture, bioavailability, and performance) that are stable in processing, packaging, distribution and storage; this is achieved by properly optimizing dry powders in formulations prior to producing microcapsules.…”
Section: Lyophilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a suitable technique for dehydration of heat-sensitive foods and microencapsulation (Desai and Park, 2005), its operations stabilize the material through four stages, firstly freezing of the core and wall material, sublimation of the lodged water avoiding friction with oxygen, desorption and finally storage (Ezhilarasi et al, 2013). Some of its advantages are related to low water activity, inhibiting the proliferation of microorganisms and improving the firmness of the microcapsules (Figueiredo et al, 2022); the technique is feasible to microencapsulate compounds intolerant to high temperatures, in addition to having a low oxidation rate (Kour et al, 2023); however, its disadvantages include the operation time (up to 20 h) and the production of porous spherical structures that cause rehydration of the microcapsules and, consequently, increased moisture (Karthik and Anandharamakrishnan, 2012). Wang et al (2017) microencapsulated heme iron using maltodextrin, carboxymethyl cellulose and sodium caseinate achieving an efficiency of 98.64%.…”
Section: Lyophilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%