Handbook of the Equity Risk Premium

Mehra, Rajnish

doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-50899-7.x5001-5

Cited by 30 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 117 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Mehra and Prescott (1985) pointed out that the equity market premium is much higher than what is justified by the fundamentals. Since then, the researchers have attempted to explain this equity premium puzzle (see Mehra, 2008). However, Bessembinder (2018) has recently demonstrated that the observed equity premium results from returns on very few best-performing stocks, while the rest of the stocks do not outperform the treasury bills.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does the low-risk anomaly exist in the Indian equity market? A test using alternative risk measures

Ali

Badhani

Kumar

2021

JES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis study aims to investigate the risk-return trade-off in the Indian equity market at both the aggregate equity market level and in the cross-sections of stock return using alternative risk measures.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses weekly and monthly data of 3,085 Bombay Stock Exchange-listed stocks spanning over 20 years from January 2000 to December 2019. The study evaluates the risk-return trade-off at the aggregate equity market level using the value-weighted and the equal-weighted broader portfolios. Eight different risk proxies belonging to the conventional, downside and extreme risk categories are considered to analyse the cross-sectional risk-return relationship.FindingsThe results show a positive equity premium on the value-weighted portfolio; however, the equal-weighted portfolio of these stocks shows an average return lower than the return on the 91-day Treasury Bills. The inverted size premium mainly causes this anomaly in the Indian equity market as the small stocks have lower returns than big stocks. The study presents a strong negative risk-return relationship across different risk proxies. However, under the subsample of more liquid stocks, the low-risk anomaly regarding other risk proxies becomes moderate except the beta-anomaly. This anomalous relationship seems to be caused by small and less liquid stocks having low institutional ownership and higher short-selling constraints.Practical implicationsThe findings have important implications for investors, managers and practitioners. Investors can incorporate the effects of different highlighted anomalies in their investment strategies to fetch higher returns. Managers can also use these findings in their capital budgeting decisions, resource allocations and other diverse range of direct and indirect decisions, particularly in emerging markets such as India. The findings provide insights to practitioners while valuing the firms.Originality/valueThe study is among the earlier attempts to examine the risk-return trade-off in an emerging equity market at both the aggregate equity market level and in the cross-sections of stock returns using alternative measures of risk and expected returns.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%