1973
DOI: 10.21236/ad0755356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handbook, Uncertainty in Gas Turbine Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, tests were conducted by gradually decreasing the heat flux down to zero. Instruments were calibrated and the uncertainty of measured parameters evaluated according to the procedure suggested by Abernethy and Thompson [23] with results summarized in Table 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, tests were conducted by gradually decreasing the heat flux down to zero. Instruments were calibrated and the uncertainty of measured parameters evaluated according to the procedure suggested by Abernethy and Thompson [23] with results summarized in Table 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temperature measurements were calibrated and the temperature uncertainty was evaluated according to the procedure suggested by Abernethy and Thompson [34]. Accounting for all instrument errors, uncertainties for the calculated parameter were estimated using the method of sequential perturbation according to Moffat [35].…”
Section: Validation Of Data Concerning the Two-phase Flow Characterizmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precision of a sensor can be given with a precision index [2], which is in essence a sample standard deviation obtained from the repeated measurements and indicates the maximum allowable error limit of the sensor. For clarity and practical significance, we define two kinds of sensor precisions as follows.…”
Section: Compatibility Of the Sensor Precisions In A Crmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern power plants are monitored by hundreds of sensors and ultimate basis for the operating state assessments and the control decisions are those measurement values collected continuously during power plant operations. In spite of various rudimentary sensor value validation techniques routinely practiced in industries [1], in reality, final measurement values quite often include errors and pick up noises [2]- [4] or sensors themselves may even fail. The control actions based on such invalid or failed sensor values can lead to serious consequences such as total plant shutdowns and/or equipment damages, resulting in significant economic losses or even putting the human operators' safeties in jeopardy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%