2023
DOI: 10.3233/wor-211368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handgrip strength and its correlation with anthropometric determinants and hand dimensions in children aged 6-12 years: A cross-sectional study

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Handgrip strength is considered an important interpreter of general health, and hand functions in children. It is mainly influenced by anthropometric determinants and hand dimensions. OBJECTIVE: To assess the handgrip strength and their association with anthropometric determinants, hand circumference, hand span, and hand length among school children in both the dominant and non-dominant hand. METHODS: Anthropometric measurements, hand circumference, hand span, hand length, and grip strength measure… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before intervention, BFR was lower in high MF males than in low MF males, while BW, BMI, CC, WC, HC, and SBP were higher in high MF females than in low MF females. Similarly to our findings, Kakaraparthi et al 39 reported a positive correlation between grip strength and BW and BMI in females aged 6 to 12. High MF levels may be associated with increased muscle mass and function among boys, potentially leading to a lower BFR.…”
Section: Basic Characteristics Of the Two Groupssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Before intervention, BFR was lower in high MF males than in low MF males, while BW, BMI, CC, WC, HC, and SBP were higher in high MF females than in low MF females. Similarly to our findings, Kakaraparthi et al 39 reported a positive correlation between grip strength and BW and BMI in females aged 6 to 12. High MF levels may be associated with increased muscle mass and function among boys, potentially leading to a lower BFR.…”
Section: Basic Characteristics Of the Two Groupssupporting
confidence: 92%