Handgrip strength predicts length of hospital stay in an abdominal surgical setting: the role of frailty beyond age

Abstract

Background Chronological age per se cannot be considered a prognostic risk factor for outcomes after elective surgery, whereas frailty could be. A simple and easy-to-get marker for frailty, such as handgrip strength (HGS), may support the surgeon in decision for an adequate healthcare plan. Aims The aims of this study were to: (1) determine the prevalence of frailty in an abdominal surgery setting independent of age; (2) evaluate the predictive validity of HGS for the length of hospital stay (LOS). Methods This is a retrospective study conducted in subjects who underwent abdominal surgical procedures. Only subjects with complete cognitive, functional, nutritional assessments and available measurement of HGS at admission were included. A final cohort of 108 patients were enrolled in the study. Results Subjects had a mean age of 67.8 ± 15.8 years (age range 19–93 years old) and were mostly men. According to Fried’s criteria, 17 (15.7%, 4F/13 M) were fit, 58 (23.7%; 24F/34 M) were pre-frail and 33 (30.6%; 20F/13 M) were frail. As expected, HGS significantly differed between groups having frail lower values as compared with pre-frail and fit persons (fit: 32.99 ± 10.34 kg; pre-frail: 27.49 ± 10.35 kg; frail: 15.96 ± 9.52 kg, p < 0.0001). A final regression analysis showed that HGS was significantly and inversely associated with LOS (p = 0.020) independent of multiple covariates, including age. Discussion Most of the population undergoing abdominal surgery is pre-frail or frail. The measurement of handgrip strength is simple and inexpensive, and provides prognostic information for surgical outcomes. Muscle strength, as measured by handgrip dynamometry, is a strong predictor of LOS in a surgical setting.

Impact of geriatric nutritional risk index on outcomes after gastrectomy in elderly patients with gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study in Japan

“…Aging is an inevitable process for all humans, and the global aging population is increasing in parallel to improved quality of life and medical advances [1]. Elderly individuals constitute one of the most vulnerable populations and are at high risk for various nutritional issues and comorbidities including gastric cancer [2][3][4]. Indeed, the rate of elderly patients with gastric cancer is increasing and their high mortality rate is an issue [5,6].…”

Current Trends in Volume and Surgical Outcomes in Gastric Cancer

“…Over the past years, several studies have investigated the effect of hospital volume on gastric cancer surgery outcomes, leading to the concept that centralization results in better outcomes, acting as a proxy measure for various processes and providing the advantages of a qualified multidisciplinary team and a comprehensive multidimensional assessment [ 85 , 86 ], easier access to sophisticated cancer imaging equipment, availability of skilled surgeons, and better postoperative care facilities [ 30 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 ]. In this regard, an experienced radiologist with dedicated skills in gastric cancer metastasis detection (i.e., gastric carcinomatosis) is fundamental to allow for better patient selection [ 91 ].…”

Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and HIPEC for Advanced Ovarian Cancer with Peritoneal Metastases: Italian PSM Oncoteam Evidence and Study Purposes

“…In 2021, the OVHIPEC group, using the EORTC questionnaires, concluded that the addition of HIPEC to interval CRS does not negatively impact health-related quality of life [ 144 ]. Opting for therapeutic choices considering the patients’ clinical conditions [ 150 ], comorbidities, age and frailty status is necessary to improve their quality of life and life expectancy [ 151 ].…”