“…The study showed that the three scanners are comparable in terms of reproducibility, but only the Artec Leo and 3dMD can be considered clinically accurate (with mean accuracies of 0.81 ± 0.71 mm and 0.89 ± 0.66 mm, respectively). On the other hand, several studies (Glinkowski et al , 2009; Lain et al , 2017; Uccheddu et al , 2018; Kidane et al , 2019; Deng et al , 2020a, 2020b, Song et al , 2020; Servi et al , 2021) proposed ad-hoc devices for chest acquisition, combining commercial devices (including Microsoft Kinect v1, Microsoft Kinect v2, Intel RealSense D415) with hardware structures specifically designed to better acquire the region of interest. The realized devices can be divided into multi-camera (Glinkowski et al , 2009; Lain et al , 2017) or single-camera (Uccheddu et al , 2018; Kidane et al , 2019; Deng et al , 2020a, 2020b, Song et al , 2020; Servi et al , 2021) scanners with manual (Deng et al , 2020a, 2020b, Servi et al , 2021), or automatic (Glinkowski et al , 2009; Lain et al , 2017; Uccheddu et al , 2018; Kidane et al , 2019; Song et al , 2020) handling.…”