Proceedings of the Twelfth Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing 2021
DOI: 10.1145/3490035.3490289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handling ambiguous annotations for facial expression recognition in the wild

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between FER and FER+ is that the FER+ is the new relabelled dataset by ten crowd-sourced taggerregis, as can be seen in Fig. 2, which proved better quality ground truth for still image emotion than the original FER labels [14]. Ten taggers for each image enable researchers to estimate an emotion probability distribution per face, and this allows for constructing algorithms that produce statistical distributions or multi-label outputs instead of the conventional single-label output.…”
Section: A the Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between FER and FER+ is that the FER+ is the new relabelled dataset by ten crowd-sourced taggerregis, as can be seen in Fig. 2, which proved better quality ground truth for still image emotion than the original FER labels [14]. Ten taggers for each image enable researchers to estimate an emotion probability distribution per face, and this allows for constructing algorithms that produce statistical distributions or multi-label outputs instead of the conventional single-label output.…”
Section: A the Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%