2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.optcom.2015.06.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handling beam propagation in air for nearly 10-fs laser damage experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For every beam that we measured for a given energy E, the free parameters of the numerical fit are: the order n of each participating SG function (note that n ¼ 1 corresponds to a Gaussian function), the radius w n at 1/e 2 , and the weighting coefficient a n ensuring that the 2D integration over r of the fluence function FðrÞ equals the energy carried by the beam. Note that we neglect the small loss of energy due to plasma creation in air, since we measured in previous work 12 that it is limited to $1%, in agreement with recent numerical predictions 20,21 in such sharp focusing conditions. In fact, the numerical fitting of the beam enables to evaluate the peak fluence value (used to calibrate Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For every beam that we measured for a given energy E, the free parameters of the numerical fit are: the order n of each participating SG function (note that n ¼ 1 corresponds to a Gaussian function), the radius w n at 1/e 2 , and the weighting coefficient a n ensuring that the 2D integration over r of the fluence function FðrÞ equals the energy carried by the beam. Note that we neglect the small loss of energy due to plasma creation in air, since we measured in previous work 12 that it is limited to $1%, in agreement with recent numerical predictions 20,21 in such sharp focusing conditions. In fact, the numerical fitting of the beam enables to evaluate the peak fluence value (used to calibrate Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…Figure 2 shows that the experimental data are fully in accordance with this equation only for low incident energies, until E air NL ¼ 7:5 lJ (corresponding intensity I air NL ¼ 1:65 Â 10 14 Wcm À2 ). As expected, this value is slightly above the intensity we previously determined, 12 the small difference being related to the observable used for defining it. In our former experiment, we indeed measured the energy above which the beam focal plane begins to move out of the linear focus while here we observe the consequences of such displacement on an outcome of the interaction, e.g., the ablation diameter.…”
supporting
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations