2016
DOI: 10.1108/s0733-558x20150000045018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handling Different Institutional Logics in the Public Sector: Comparing Management in Norwegian Universities and Hospitals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For administrators, strategy process and strategy implementation are a more natural part of their work. These findings are aligned with the evidence (both within and outside the Nordic region) that recent reform processes aimed at transforming universities into more coherent, strategic actors (Pinheiro and Stensaker 2013;Ramirez 2006) have resulted in a growing gap regarding the values, practices, and priorities of university managers as compared to those of the academic heartland (Berg and Pinheiro 2016;Pekkola et al 2017).…”
Section: Institutional Strategies and Actorssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…For administrators, strategy process and strategy implementation are a more natural part of their work. These findings are aligned with the evidence (both within and outside the Nordic region) that recent reform processes aimed at transforming universities into more coherent, strategic actors (Pinheiro and Stensaker 2013;Ramirez 2006) have resulted in a growing gap regarding the values, practices, and priorities of university managers as compared to those of the academic heartland (Berg and Pinheiro 2016;Pekkola et al 2017).…”
Section: Institutional Strategies and Actorssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The perceived decision-making power of leaders differs significantly between countries, with Danish managers reporting the lowest degree of power. This finding is, in itself, rather interesting since the rationale for implementing NPMinspired unitary management models (with centralization of decisionmaking) is to empower specific (formal managers) individuals (Berg and Pinheiro 2016). Thus, it should be reflected in the views of academic staff in interviews, stressing what they perceived as increasing managerial power.…”
Section: Decision-making and Organizational Structuresmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In this model, the vice-chancellor was the chair of the board. A model referred to as the unitary leadership model (Berg and Pinheiro 2016) was also offered as an alternative model (this was preferred by the government). In this model, the vice-chancellor was appointed by the board for a certain period and had the full responsibility for both academic and administrative matters, and the law did not demand an administrative director in this model.…”
Section: National Reforms and Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%