2023
DOI: 10.3102/10769986231151224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handling Missing Data in Cross-Classified Multilevel Analyses: An Evaluation of Different Multiple Imputation Approaches

Abstract: Multiple imputation (MI) is a popular method for handling missing data. In education research, it can be challenging to use MI because the data often have a clustered structure that need to be accommodated during MI. Although much research has considered applications of MI in hierarchical data, little is known about its use in cross-classified data, in which observations are clustered in multiple higher-level units simultaneously (e.g., schools and neighborhoods, transitions from primary to secondary schools).… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The percentage of missing values per variable varied from 0% to 45.3% (Table 1). To deal with missing data we used an adjusted cluster-means imputation approach for multilevel data (Grund et al, 2023) and generated 50 multiply imputed datasets for each sample using the mice (van Buuren & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, 2011) and miceadds ) R packages. Notably, the applied imputation model was compatible with the models that we specified for estimating single-and multilevel design parameters.…”
Section: Stage 1: Treatment Of Missing Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percentage of missing values per variable varied from 0% to 45.3% (Table 1). To deal with missing data we used an adjusted cluster-means imputation approach for multilevel data (Grund et al, 2023) and generated 50 multiply imputed datasets for each sample using the mice (van Buuren & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, 2011) and miceadds ) R packages. Notably, the applied imputation model was compatible with the models that we specified for estimating single-and multilevel design parameters.…”
Section: Stage 1: Treatment Of Missing Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Handling of Missing Data. In the first step of our effect-size calculations, we applied multiply nested imputations to impute the missing data in our target variables (Weirich et al, 2014) while taking into account the nested structure of the data (Grund et al, 2023). The details of the imputation process can be found in OSM 4.…”
Section: Stage 1: Computation Of Effect Sizesmentioning
confidence: 99%