2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2014.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handling ties in heuristics for the permutation flow shop scheduling problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, these ties must be broken with a tiebreaking mechanism to increase solution quality. Kalczynski and Kamburowski (2008), Dong et al (2008), Fernandez-Viagas and Framinan (2014), and Vasiljevic and Danilovic (2015) proposed new tiebreaking mechanisms for the problem. Fernandez-Viagas and Framinan (2014) presented a tiebreaking mechanism (TB FF ) for NEH, IG RIS , and IG_RS LS algorithms.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, these ties must be broken with a tiebreaking mechanism to increase solution quality. Kalczynski and Kamburowski (2008), Dong et al (2008), Fernandez-Viagas and Framinan (2014), and Vasiljevic and Danilovic (2015) proposed new tiebreaking mechanisms for the problem. Fernandez-Viagas and Framinan (2014) presented a tiebreaking mechanism (TB FF ) for NEH, IG RIS , and IG_RS LS algorithms.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, improvements in the initial order of the NEH have been proposed by e.g. Framinan, Leisten, and Rajendran (2003) and Vasiljevic and Danilovic (2015) . Regarding improvements in the insertion phase of the NEH, Rad, Ruiz, and Boroojerdian (2009) propose several heuristics (denoted as FRB1, FRB2, FRB3, FRB4_k and FRB5) where a partial insertion local search method after the insertion of a job is employed.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flowshop scheduling problem has been proven to be nondeterministic polynomial-time hard (NP-hard) when the number of machines is larger than 2 [10]. Many studies [5,11] focus on the static environment which simplifies the problem constraint. However, more attention should be paid to dynamic aspects that frequently occurred in reality such as new order arrival [12,13], machine breakdown [14], and rush order [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%