2020
DOI: 10.1037/tra0000713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handling uncertainty and ambiguity in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Abstract: The 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak is unprecedented. Yet some look to ready-made models to address it. This creates confusion about more adaptive responses that reflect an uncertain and ambiguous context. Those assessing associated mental health challenges must be wary of overdiagnosis. Handling the pandemic well, requires engaging the public as mature partners.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…During the confinement, the number of requests increased ten times (2,784 requests) and resulted in 7,561 (314%) consultation items. These increases are in agreement with the predictions and later confirmation of an overload of psychological burden and support demands recorded in the first wave of the pandemic ( 28 , 29 ), referred to as being also increased (not yet quantified) in the second and current third wave of this pandemic. From a gender perspective, the ratio of requests between women and men was similar in both quarters.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the confinement, the number of requests increased ten times (2,784 requests) and resulted in 7,561 (314%) consultation items. These increases are in agreement with the predictions and later confirmation of an overload of psychological burden and support demands recorded in the first wave of the pandemic ( 28 , 29 ), referred to as being also increased (not yet quantified) in the second and current third wave of this pandemic. From a gender perspective, the ratio of requests between women and men was similar in both quarters.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, critical analysis by experts pointed out the resistance and resilience capacity of the general population being underestimated. They recommended careful administration of the limited resources to be able to respond to the needs of individuals already receiving psychological/psychiatric support and those identified as vulnerable or at risk “( 28 ). In the present work, statistical analysis confirmed M+ diagnosis as a critical factor, with increases in most of the domains and items observed in M+ patients being significantly higher than those recorded in M- patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extending beyond the context of negativity bias and affective disorders, valence bias can also powerfully impact our decision-making across many domains. Indeed, decision-making under uncertainty is ubiquitous in daily life (e.g., financial, medical, and social decision-making; see [25][26][27] for respective reviews) and is particularly salient in the current worldwide pandemic (e.g., 28,29 ). Thus, our responses to uncertainty can have dramatic and widespread consequences.…”
Section: Social Connectedness and Negative Affect Uniquely Explain Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of this, we can see also a certain feeling of pride circulating in the social work community: pride in having rapidly adjusted and in having managed, throughout the emergency, to find ways to connect and promote relationships in education, research and practice (Zanni, 2020). The fact that there were immediate reactions by social workers organizations can be also considered a sign of how the professional community was somehow active and alive even before the emergency (Durodié, 2020). The chair of the National Council of Social Workers has just issued a public message, highlighting paying tribute to practitioners for their work during the emergency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%