2020
DOI: 10.1128/msystems.01074-20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handwashing and Detergent Treatment Greatly Reduce SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load on Halloween Candy Handled by COVID-19 Patients

Abstract: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and potential public health implications, we are publishing this peer-reviewed manuscript in its accepted form. The final, copyedited version of the paper will be available at a later date. Although SARS-CoV-2 is primarily transmitted by respiratory droplets and aerosols, transmission by fomites remains plausible. During Halloween, a major event for children in numerous countries, SARS-CoV-2 transmission risk via candy fomites worries many parents. To address this concern, we enrol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, RT-qPCR techniques-even those formulated to resist inhibitors-were sensitive to substances contained in the environmental samples collected by a pilot cohort of citizen scientists, even after the use of other common strategies to reduce inhibitor competition for enzyme binding 49 . These findings are corroborated by a recent study that compared both methods to detect SARS-CoV-2 on swab samples from candy handled by COVID-19 patients and found over 83% result concordance, with 25% lower inhibition in samples analyzed by RT-LAMP 15 . Furthermore, the GITC-chloroform crude extraction, coupled with RT-LAMP, reduced the cost of reagents and supplies by 42% compared to RNA kit extraction and RT-qPCR (Table of Materials…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, RT-qPCR techniques-even those formulated to resist inhibitors-were sensitive to substances contained in the environmental samples collected by a pilot cohort of citizen scientists, even after the use of other common strategies to reduce inhibitor competition for enzyme binding 49 . These findings are corroborated by a recent study that compared both methods to detect SARS-CoV-2 on swab samples from candy handled by COVID-19 patients and found over 83% result concordance, with 25% lower inhibition in samples analyzed by RT-LAMP 15 . Furthermore, the GITC-chloroform crude extraction, coupled with RT-LAMP, reduced the cost of reagents and supplies by 42% compared to RNA kit extraction and RT-qPCR (Table of Materials…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using RT-LAMP has been demonstrated to be over 83% concordant to using RT-qPCR. Furthermore, RT-LAMP resulted in 25% reduction in inconclusive results compared to RT-qPCR 15 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Exponential viral decay was predicted from the linear regression models for all surfaces tested, indicated by a straight line of decay on the log 10 viral PFU scale (Fig. 6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…8 This is thought to be from the spread of respiratory droplets via breathing, sneezing and coughing, 9 and the transfer of SARS-CoV-2 to objects from the hands of patients has been documented. 10 The minimum infectious dose of SARS-CoV-2 is currently unknown, 7 which makes quantifying the required viral load for transmission difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%