1977
DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4103_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handwriting Characteristics and Their Relationship to Eysenck's Extraversion-Introversion and Kagan's Impulsivity-Relfectivity Dimensions

Abstract: Examined the relationship between certain handwriting characteristics and Eysenck's Extraversion-Introversion and Kagan's Impulsivity-Reflectivity personality dimensions. Using 46 female subjects, scores on the EPQ inventory and Matching Familiar Figures test were compared by factor analysis to the handwriting characteristics of: middle zone height; middle zone breadth; upper zone height; lower zone height; space between words; right margin breadth; left margin breadth; a general size measure; handwriting time… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…example, Rooij & Hazelzet, 1997;Tett & Palmer, 1997;Wiliams, Berg-Cross & Berg-Cross, 1977); incoherent theories for personality and handwriting as a basis of the analysis; lack of control groups or inappropriate selection of control groups; lack of control of fundamental factors, such as age, sex, intellectual level, health, handedness, type of ball-pen, type of writing basis, incorrect procedure of writing tasks, which may have an impact on handwriting (i.e. Wiliams, Berg-Cross & Berg-Cross, 1977;Furnham, Chamorro-Premuzic & Callahan, 2003;King & Koehler, 2000;Tett & Palmer, 1997). Unclear system of coding of the handwriting parameters was also significant limitation of many studies (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…example, Rooij & Hazelzet, 1997;Tett & Palmer, 1997;Wiliams, Berg-Cross & Berg-Cross, 1977); incoherent theories for personality and handwriting as a basis of the analysis; lack of control groups or inappropriate selection of control groups; lack of control of fundamental factors, such as age, sex, intellectual level, health, handedness, type of ball-pen, type of writing basis, incorrect procedure of writing tasks, which may have an impact on handwriting (i.e. Wiliams, Berg-Cross & Berg-Cross, 1977;Furnham, Chamorro-Premuzic & Callahan, 2003;King & Koehler, 2000;Tett & Palmer, 1997). Unclear system of coding of the handwriting parameters was also significant limitation of many studies (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several studies addressing this personality trait has been completed, it is impossible to conclude that the associations between handwriting and extra-introversion trait are confirmed. For instance, Williams, Berg-Cross, & Berg-Cross (1977) found the correlations between handwriting parameters (slant, upper zone height, middle zone height) and results in extra-introversion measured by Eysenck's MPI. The research made by Lester, McLaughlin and Nosal (1977), and by Rosenthal and Lines (1978) have not confirmed the above findings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there are research [10][11][12][13] aiming at discovering these relationships. Castelnuovo et al [10] analyze the connection of "imitation" and "natural writing" with intelligence, originality, anxiety, compulsiveness, sexuality, and temperament and conclude that handwriting highly reflects writer's personality and "natural writing" does more profoundly than "imitation. "…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lemke et al [11] use handwriting to predict personality and intelligence. Williams et al [12] reveal that there is obvious connection between personal handwriting and extraversion and behavioral model. Peeples et al [13] also analyze the affection of handwriting on different genders and personality traits.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is still a distinct lack of evidence to support its validity or reliability (e.g. Rosenthal and Lines [78], Williams et al [79], Lester et al [80], Klimoski and Rafaeli[81]). Further, many of the studies that do show some validity can be criticised for significant methodological flaws and the use of relatively small sample sizes to generate often widely generalised conclusions.…”
Section: Graphologymentioning
confidence: 99%