2018 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication Control and Networking (ICACCCN) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icacccn.2018.8748540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handwriting recognition using Deep Learning in Keras

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study differs from other existed work because it reveals the effectiveness of CNN in terms of high accuracy and low computational time to classify handwritten digits [36][37][38][39]. With extensive literature survey, it comes to know that accuracy of various reported CNN models is not up to the mark as mentioned in Table 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study differs from other existed work because it reveals the effectiveness of CNN in terms of high accuracy and low computational time to classify handwritten digits [36][37][38][39]. With extensive literature survey, it comes to know that accuracy of various reported CNN models is not up to the mark as mentioned in Table 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Ciresan et al [35] presented convolutional neural network committees for handwritten character classification. Arora [36] employed two architectures: feed-forward neural network (FWNN) and convolutional neural network (CNN) for feature extraction, training and classification of MNIST dataset constituting handwritten images. Outcomes reveal that for the handwritten digit recognition, CNN attains greater accuracy than FWNN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the results show the potential of this methodology even without freezing and demonstrate that being able to freeze the pre-trained section should increase the performance of EXPANSE in the future. We chose the MNIST dataset [27,28] and a deep neural network model similar to [29,28] for our evaluation process. This dataset consists of 60,000 handwritten digits for the training set and 10,000 samples for testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed system in [4] used the following methods to recognize characters in Tamil and English languages -pre-processing, segmentation, feature extraction, and classification and recognition. The authors in [5] have used Keras for the classification MNIST dataset in which feed-forward neural network and convolutional neural network were used for feature extraction. It was observed that convolutional neural network performed better than the feed-forward neural network.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%