2015 4th International Symposium on Emerging Trends and Technologies in Libraries and Information Services 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ettlis.2015.7048173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handwritten Hindi character recognition using k-means clustering and SVM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The work has also compared the efficiency of using various features such as Marte-Bunke feature, PHOG, Gaber, G-PHOG and claims to get highest accuracy of 94.51% for GPHOG features. Another approach [19] of character recognition used k-mean clustering for features extraction and features are used on SVM classifier with linear kernel. The highest accuracy which was claimed with SVM classifier is 95.86% and that with Euclidean distance is 81.7%.…”
Section: Machine Learning Based Braille Transliteration Of Odia Langumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work has also compared the efficiency of using various features such as Marte-Bunke feature, PHOG, Gaber, G-PHOG and claims to get highest accuracy of 94.51% for GPHOG features. Another approach [19] of character recognition used k-mean clustering for features extraction and features are used on SVM classifier with linear kernel. The highest accuracy which was claimed with SVM classifier is 95.86% and that with Euclidean distance is 81.7%.…”
Section: Machine Learning Based Braille Transliteration Of Odia Langumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is the reson for why algorithms applied in image recognition are effective to approach the character recognition systems. Correctly, many algorithms hidden Markov model [1], neural network [2], or support vector machine (SVM) [6] confirm the high performance; however, most researches have referred to SVM algorithm as the best method illustrated in [4][6] [8]. Normally, both training and recognition processes are implemented on high power PC to tackle the complicated training SVM algorithm and long converge time.…”
Section: Training and Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the result, almost researches have utilized the standard resources such as USPS, or MNIST for handwritten numbers as illustration in [1] and [2]. Besides, some researches have approached Greek characters [3], India characters [4], or Thailand characters [5] following the authors' mother languages. That is root cause of hardly estimating or comparing the performance of character recognition systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering is a bottom up approach where each observation starts in its own cluster, and pairs of clusters are merged as one moves up in the hierarchy [13].The result of the hierarchical methods is a dendrogram, representing the nested grouping of objects. There are different methods for agglomeration such as single, complete, average methods.…”
Section: Agglomerative Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%