1996
DOI: 10.2172/202349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hanford high-level waste melter system evaluation data packages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reviews of melter technologies for application to Hanford tank waste immobilization detail the pros and cons of each along with more information on their designs 25,37–40 . The conclusions of these studies suggest that advanced JHCMs and CCIMs are best suited to vitrification of U.S. legacy tank wastes.…”
Section: Melter Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reviews of melter technologies for application to Hanford tank waste immobilization detail the pros and cons of each along with more information on their designs 25,37–40 . The conclusions of these studies suggest that advanced JHCMs and CCIMs are best suited to vitrification of U.S. legacy tank wastes.…”
Section: Melter Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LFCM, first developed at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in 1970 has been fully developed, tested, and deployed at the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP), DWPF and a number of international waste vitrification plants; and therefore represents the most mature technology for treatment of current US HLW inventories. The LFCM was selected for Hanford HLW vitrification after a number of expert reviews of potential melter technologies (Brinko et al 2003;Calmus 1995;Elliott et al 1996;Perez et al 2001) and was the technology proposed by the contractors selected for the Hanford Waste Vitrification Plant (HWVP), Tank Waste Remediation System -Privatization (TWRS-P), and WTP projects. The selection of the LFCM, in each case, was primarily due to good general performance and high technical readiness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%