Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Characterization

Neitzel, D.A.; Antonio, Ernest J.; O, Eschbach, Tara; Fowler, Richard A.; Goodwin, Shannon M; Harvey, David; Hendrickson, P.L.; Hoitink, D.J.; Horton, Duane G.; Last, George V; Poston, Ted M.; Prendergast, Ellen L.; Rohay, Alan C.; Thorne, Paul D.

doi:10.2172/15020979

Cited by 10 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Because the dust in frequented areas, such as dirt roads, might be enhanced because of mechanical disturbances, an annual average mass-loading value of 50 μg/m 3 is appropriate. This value is approximately three times higher than the annual average concentration of respirable dust measured on and around the Hanford Site (Neitzel et al 2006). …”

Section: References Individual Sampling Location Informationmentioning

confidence: 61%

Soil Sampling to Demonstrate Compliance with Department of Energy Radiological Clearance Requirements for the McGee Ranch-Riverlands and North Slope Units of the Hanford Reach National Monument

Fritz¹,

Dirkes²,

Napier³

2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: References Individual Sampling Location Informationmentioning

confidence: 61%

Soil Sampling to Demonstrate Compliance with Department of Energy Radiological Clearance Requirements for the McGee Ranch-Riverlands and North Slope Units of the Hanford Reach National Monument

Fritz¹,

Dirkes²,

Napier³

2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Sedimentary material consisting of silts, sands, and gravel of the Hanford Formation and Ringold Formation cover thick basalt flows. Partially saturated sediments have a high absorption capacity (Neitzel 1996). Areas adjacent to the Hanford Site are primarily agricultural lands.…”

Section: Site Description and Field Estimates Of E O Et And Infiltrmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fuzzy-probabilistic calculations of water-balance uncertainty

Faybishenko

2010

Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hydrogeological systems are often characterized by imprecise, vague, inconsistent, incomplete, or subjective information, which may limit the application of conventional stochastic methods in predicting hydrogeologic conditions and associated uncertainty. Instead, predictions and uncertainty analysis can be made using uncertain input parameters expressed as probability boxes, intervals, and fuzzy numbers. The objective of this paper is to present the theory for, and a case study as an application of, the fuzzyprobabilistic approach, combining probability and possibility theory for simulating soil water balance and assessing associated uncertainty in the components of a simple waterbalance equation. The application of this approach is demonstrated using calculations with the RAMAS Risk Calc code, to assess the propagation of uncertainty in calculating potential evapotranspiration, actual evapotranspiration, and infiltration-in a case study at the Hanford site, Washington, USA. Propagation of uncertainty into the results of water-balance calculations was evaluated by changing the types of models of uncertainty incorporated into various input parameters. The results of these fuzzy-probabilistic calculations are compared to the conventional Monte Carlo simulation approach and estimates from field observations at the Hanford site.

show abstract

“…This section summarizes information on the climate and meteorology, geology and soil, hydrology, and ecology. Portions of this section were extracted from existing reports, including Neitzel et al (2005), Hoitink et al (2005), Reidel and Chamness (2007), Fayer andSzecsody (2004), Hartman et al (2007), and Horton (2007). For brevity, references in the original texts are not included here.…”

Section: Affected Environmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Reidel and Chamness (2007) provide an extensive review of the geology of the Hanford Site as it relates to the SST WMAs. Elements of their review as well as material from Neitzel (2005) are included here to provide the geologic context for understanding recharge.…”

Section: Windmentioning

confidence: 99%

Recharge Data Package for Hanford Single-Shell Tank Waste Management Areas

Fayer¹,

Keller²

2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Characterization

Cited by 10 publications

References 0 publications

Soil Sampling to Demonstrate Compliance with Department of Energy Radiological Clearance Requirements for the McGee Ranch-Riverlands and North Slope Units of the Hanford Reach National Monument

Soil Sampling to Demonstrate Compliance with Department of Energy Radiological Clearance Requirements for the McGee Ranch-Riverlands and North Slope Units of the Hanford Reach National Monument

Fuzzy-probabilistic calculations of water-balance uncertainty

Recharge Data Package for Hanford Single-Shell Tank Waste Management Areas

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About