2012
DOI: 10.32513/tbilisi/1528768890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hankel determinant for starlike and convex functions of order alpha

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where a 1 = 1. For brief history of Hankel determinant (see [30] [15] generalized the result from [11] giving the sharp bound of |H 2 (2)| in the class of starlike and convex functions of α. P. Zaprawa [36] showed that if f ∈ T, the class of typically real functions, then |H 2 (2)| ≤ 9. Apart from these, many research all over the globe obtained the upper bounds for various subclasses of univalent analytic functions and their results are available in literature (see [2,3,12,[22][23][24]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where a 1 = 1. For brief history of Hankel determinant (see [30] [15] generalized the result from [11] giving the sharp bound of |H 2 (2)| in the class of starlike and convex functions of α. P. Zaprawa [36] showed that if f ∈ T, the class of typically real functions, then |H 2 (2)| ≤ 9. Apart from these, many research all over the globe obtained the upper bounds for various subclasses of univalent analytic functions and their results are available in literature (see [2,3,12,[22][23][24]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the sharp bound of this determinant for the class of close-to-convex functions is unknown (see [9]). For more results on H 2,2 (f), see [10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. e estimation of |H 3,1 (f)| is much more difficult to obtain as compared to |H 2,2 (f)|.…”
Section: Introduction and Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a view of this definition, a 2 a 4 − a 2 3 is the second Hankel determinant (more precisely, H 2 (2)). The sharp bounds of |a 2 a 4 − a 3 2 | for almost all important subclasses of the class S of analytic univalent functions were found (see, for example, [3][4][5][6][7][8]). It is worth noting that we still do not know the exact bound of this expression for S, nor for C consisting of all close-to-convex functions (see [9]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%