2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-12277-5_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hankel Transforms of General Monotone Functions

Abstract: We show that the Hankel transform of a general monotone function converges uniformly if and only if the limit function is bounded. To this end, we rely on an Abel-Olivier test for realvalued functions. Analogous results for cosine series are derived as well. We also show that our statements do not hold without the general monotonicity assumption in the case of cosine integrals and series.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof. The proof just consists on rewriting that of [9] in the context of functions, with the difference that in the mentioned work the parameter r = 2 is fixed (see also [14], where this idea was originally carried out for sequences). Assume (3.3) does not hold for n ∈ Z.…”
Section: General Monotone Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proof. The proof just consists on rewriting that of [9] in the context of functions, with the difference that in the mentioned work the parameter r = 2 is fixed (see also [14], where this idea was originally carried out for sequences). Assume (3.3) does not hold for n ∈ Z.…”
Section: General Monotone Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameter r will be arbitrarily chosen at each point according to our convenience. In contrast with [9,14], here we consider a slightly different definition of good numbers by incorporating the parameter r > 0 (in the cited papers r = 2 is fixed). The reason to do this is that every power function x ρ (which is a GM function for any ρ) will have an infinite amount of good numbers if r is chosen appropriately according to ρ.…”
Section: Lemma 31 ([23]mentioning
confidence: 99%