2011
DOI: 10.3898/newf.71.03.2011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hannah Arendt and the Concept of Revolution in the 1960s

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This extends a thread already present in Arendt’s thinking: “the social” as the blockage of the new through the conversion of free action into manipulable “behaviour.” Arendt’s worry about the social concerns, as Richard H King (2011: 33) argues, “a shift … from participatory freedom to political and historical necessity.” “The social” describes the processes (and theories) that threaten to enact this shift. Broadly speaking, Arendt’s argument is that the fragile boundaries of the public sphere and the ephemeral character of political action are increasingly consumed by the automaticity and necessity of the economic.…”
Section: The Counterinsurgent Logic Of the Socialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This extends a thread already present in Arendt’s thinking: “the social” as the blockage of the new through the conversion of free action into manipulable “behaviour.” Arendt’s worry about the social concerns, as Richard H King (2011: 33) argues, “a shift … from participatory freedom to political and historical necessity.” “The social” describes the processes (and theories) that threaten to enact this shift. Broadly speaking, Arendt’s argument is that the fragile boundaries of the public sphere and the ephemeral character of political action are increasingly consumed by the automaticity and necessity of the economic.…”
Section: The Counterinsurgent Logic Of the Socialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Richard King, “Hannah Arendt and the Concept of Revolution,” New Formations 71, no. 03 (2011): 30–45; David Scott, Conscripts of Modernity: The Tragedy of Colonial Enlightenment (Durham: Duke University Press, 2004), 212–220; and Nick Nesbitt, Universal Emancipation , (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2008), 126–7.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%